- The One Source of All: God as Essence and Origin of Existence
A Whisper from the Infinite (Poetic Reflection)
I close my eyes and breathe the silent air, sensing an eternal presence woven through every atom of my being. In the stillness, a voice without sound seems to whisper: “I AM.” This is the singular truth etched into the fabric of reality, that all things are sustained by the One. In the depths of my soul, I feel a living field of energy that connects the stars in their courses and the cells in my heart. It is as if an invisible breath flows through the cosmos, an outbreath and inbreath that is the very life of the universe. I am a part of this breath, a note in the symphony of creation, resonating with the secret song of God, the One who is all in all. “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one”. This ancient affirmation rises from my memory like a song. I reflect on the oneness of God, a singular Being, beyond all comparison or division, the source from whom all existence flows. There is no other true power or deity; “I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God” declares the Holy One. In a world of countless forms and energies, I perceive only reflections of that one primal Essence. Every element of nature, every ray of light and every breath of life, carries a spark of the divine presence. God alone is, and everything that is real partakes, in some mysterious measure, of God’s being.
God’s Oneness and the Divine Essence in All Things
Philosophically and theologically, the concept of strict monotheism underlies this vision: there is a single omnipresent God who pervades the entirety of existence. The Old Testament insists on the uniqueness of God, rejecting any notion of multiple deities. The Shema of Moses emphatically proclaims the unity of the divine (“the LORD is one”), and prophets like Isaiah echo that “there is no other” god beside the LORD. This one God is not a distant watchmaker, but an intimate presence that fills the cosmos. As Jeremiah conveys in God’s own words: “Do I not fill the heavens and the earth?” declares the LORD. In other words, God’s being interpenetrates all of space and time. Modern physics offers a surprisingly consonant perspective. According to quantum field theory, what we perceive as distinct particles are actually excitations of underlying fields that exist everywhere. “Under the modern view of quantum physics, various fields pervade all of space, and particles are simply excitations, or waves, in these fields”. Even “empty” vacuum isn’t truly empty, it teems with energy and potential. This scientific insight provides a powerful metaphor for God’s omnipresence. Just as an electron is a ripple in a universal electron-field, our souls and all material things may be envisioned as ripples in the field of God’s being, each of us a particular excitation of the one divine essence. God is like the fundamental field that saturates the universe, a special “atom-like” spiritual substance and energy that underlies matter, life, and mind. In this view, every proton, every tree, every star is a mode of the one ultimate reality we call God. The Psalmist sensed this truth intuitively millennia ago: “Where can I go from Your Spirit? Where can I flee from Your presence?” (Psalm 139:7). There is nowhere that God is not, for all places are within God. If I ascend to the heavens, God is there; if I descend into the depths, God is there also. The entirety of existence lives and moves within the singular Being of God, “in Him we live and move and have our being,” as later philosophers would say (a sentiment anticipated by Jeremiah’s declaration that God fills heaven and earth). To describe God as the essence of all existence is not to diminish the distinction between Creator and creation, but to marvel at the intimacy between them. God is both transcendent (beyond the universe) and profoundly immanent (present within it). The Hebrew Bible often portrays God’s glory filling the sacred space of the Temple, but in truth the whole cosmos is God’s temple. “The whole earth is full of His glory,” cried the seraphim in Isaiah’s vision. Every molecule of the earth and every burning star is glowing with a reflection of that glory. This idea resonates with the scientific quest for a unified field theory, the attempt to find one fundamental force or substance underlying all physical phenomena. In a spiritual sense, God is the unified field that scientists seek: the singular substratum from which all forces and particles emerge, the ultimate theory-of-everything. Each discovery of science that reveals a deeper unity in nature is, for the believer, a glimpse of the One who “speaks and things come to be.”
The Breath of Creation: God’s Outbreath and the Big Bang
In the beginning, the universe was born in light. Modern cosmology tells us that roughly 13.8 billion years ago all matter, energy, space, and time as we know them sprang forth from an initial singularity, an event we call the Big Bang. This scientific narrative can be understood spiritually as the outbreath of God, the moment the One exhales and issues forth creation. The Old Testament poetically describes God creating by breath and word: “By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, and by the breath of His mouth all their host”. The “host” of heaven, the myriad stars and galaxies, came into existence by God’s divine breath. What an astonishing parallel to our modern understanding: an initial flash of light (the Big Bang’s fireball) followed by an expanding cosmos filled with stars. Genesis famously opens with “God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.” In scientific terms, the early universe was indeed a blaze of primordial light and subatomic particles. As the universe expanded and cooled, light decoupled from matter, leaving behind a faint glow that still pervades space.
The faint afterglow of Creation’s first light was actually detected by scientists as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), a pervasive microwave radiation that fills the universe. Discovered accidentally in 1965, the CMB is often called the “leftover glow” of the Big Bang. It’s a nearly uniform background of low-temperature light that we now map across the sky (as shown in the false-color all-sky oval map above, captured by the Planck satellite). This all-sky map is essentially a baby picture of the universe, showing tiny temperature ripples which are the seeds of galaxies. In scientific literature, the CMB is considered “landmark evidence of the Big Bang theory”, it confirms that the cosmos began in a hot, dense state and has been expanding and cooling ever since. How evocative to imagine this faint whisper of microwaves as the echo of God’s creative word, the aftersound of that first divine “Let there be…” resonating through space-time. The CMB quite literally **“fills all space in the observable universe”*, just as the breath of God fills all creation in theological understanding. We live immersed in the lingering radiance of the moment of creation, a physical testament to the power of God’s outbreath. From the perspective of faith, we can say God breathed forth the cosmos, and cosmology gives us a detailed description of how that breath unfolded: an initial inflationary burst, cooling into hydrogen atoms, coalescing into stars that shine and die and spread heavier elements, eventually giving birth to planets and life. The biblical writers, with inspired insight, used the image of breath (ruach, spirit) to describe God’s creative act. “By the breath of His mouth all the stars were made,” says the Psalm. That ancient metaphor aligns beautifully with today’s science. The outbreath of God is the ongoing expansion of the universe, carrying galaxies ever farther apart like sparks flying from a sacred fire. Yet an outbreath implies an eventual inbreath. All breath is cyclical, exhalation is followed by inhalation. Many religious and mystical traditions have envisioned cosmic history as a great cycle, and intriguingly, some modern scientists have proposed cyclical cosmology models. In these models, the universe’s expansion is not a one-time event but part of an endless series of bangs and crunches (or bounces). For example, early 20th-century physicists toyed with an oscillating universe theory: a universe that expands from a Big Bang, then eventually stops and collapses (Big Crunch), and then is reborn in a new Bang, an eternal rhythm of cosmic respiration. More recent proposals, like those by physicists Paul Steinhardt and Roger Penrose, have revived the idea in new forms (Steinhardt’s ekpyrotic model and Penrose’s conformal cyclic cosmology, respectively).
The Cyclical Cosmos: The Universe as God’s Outbreath and Inbreath
Cosmological data today suggests our universe will keep expanding indefinitely, but theoretical alternatives remind us that science is still probing the ultimate fate of the cosmos. Cyclical universe theories offer a grand vision: perhaps the Big Bang was not the absolute beginning but the latest breath in an eternal cycle. In a cyclic model, “the universe follows infinite, or indefinite, self-sustaining cycles”. Each cycle might begin with a fiery creation (outbreath) and end with a great compression (inbreath) before rebirthing. If such a model (or something like it) were true, it would align stunningly with spiritual intuitions. The Hindu notion of Brahma’s breaths, or the Kabbalistic idea of God’s emanation and retraction, find a consonance here. In our Old Testament-focused theology, we might say: God’s Spirit moved outward to form the world, and one day God’s power will draw all things back into unity. “From Him, through Him, and to Him are all things,” as would later be written (echoing Proverbs 16:4). Even if the physical universe does not recontract in a literal Big Crunch, we can still speak of an inbreath in a metaphysical sense. The arrow of time moves forward, yes, but the destiny of creation, in monotheistic thought, is to return to its Source. As Qohelet wrote, “the spirit returns to God who gave it.” Ultimately, all of creation is on a journey back to God. The expansion of galaxies might go on forever in physical spacetime, but the meaning of the cosmos arcs back toward unity with the Creator. In the end (or the eternally ongoing), God will be “all in all”, the diversity of the world finding its harmony and home in the One. Throughout this grand breathing cycle, God’s oneness remains constant. The forms and shapes of matter change, entire star systems come and go, but the Divine Essence that comprises and sustains reality does not change. It is like the ocean in which waves rise and fall; the waves are born and die, but the ocean abides. In the same way, the universe is born from God and will subside into God, while God ever remains, “from everlasting to everlasting, You are God”. The cyclical cosmologies being explored by scientists underscore how natural it is to think in terms of regeneration and return. They have to grapple with entropy and thermodynamics, the fact that each cycle might be different or larger, but conceptually, the idea that the Big Bang could have been a “Big Bounce”, the result of a previous universe’s end, is taken seriously by some researchers. If tomorrow evidence emerged for a cosmic contraction phase, it would only lend scientific credence to what faith has long intuited: creation is the breathing of God. The outbreath of Genesis is mirrored by the inbreath of consummation when “the heavens roll up like a scroll” (Isaiah 34:4). And just as a breath is not lost but returns to the lungs, so the energy of the universe is not lost but returns to the Divine.
The Divine Field and the Resonance of Prayer
If God is indeed the living field saturating the cosmos, then what is prayer but the act of a wave aligning with its ocean? In prayer, a human being consciously tunes themselves to the presence of the One that already envelops them. A beautiful way to conceive prayer is as a form of resonance. In physics, resonance occurs when one object vibrating at a certain frequency causes another to vibrate in harmony, for example, when a tuning fork’s note makes a nearby second tuning fork hum at the same pitch. “When an object is subjected to an external vibration of the same frequency as the object’s natural frequency, the stationary object begins to vibrate. This is resonance.” In the realm of spirit, prayer is like the soul’s tuning fork sounding the note of God. We align our hearts to the “frequency” of the divine field, and as a result, we begin to vibrate with God’s energy, amplifying the life of the spirit within and around us. However, just as in a complex physical system, resonance with the divine field does not mean we can control all outcomes. A tuning fork resonating won’t shatter a mountain; similarly, a prayerful resonance might not override the entire structure of reality or the will of God. In theology, we understand that God’s will and the larger design of the cosmos shape what happens in response to prayer. When we pray, whether supplicating for a need, or simply seeking communion, we are effectively seeking attunement. We are saying, “Let me vibrate in harmony with You, O Lord; let my desires resonate with Your purpose.” Sometimes, in that resonance, marvelous things occur (healing, peace, insight), analogous to how a resonant frequency can produce surprisingly large effects in a physical medium. Other times, we might not see the outcome we hoped for, because our individual note must still blend into the larger symphony God is conducting. The divine field is vast and includes all of creation’s vibrations, past, present, and future. Prayer aligns us with God’s subtle music, but it does not make us the solo composer of the piece. In the Old Testament, prayer is often portrayed as a dialogue with the Divine, Moses pleading for Israel, Hannah pouring out her soul, David singing his psalms. These are moments of deep resonance: “Deep calls to deep,” says Psalm 42, “at the noise of Your waterfalls.” The deep part of us calls to the deep of God, hoping to catch the same wave. When Moses went up the mountain and spent forty days with God, his face shone, one might poetically say he resonated so strongly with God’s glory that it left a physical mark of radiance. In quiet prayer today, we seek that same glow internally: a clarified mind, a warmed heart, a sense of being enveloped by love. We align with the divine frequency and find our chaotic vibrations (worries, fears) becoming harmonized. This concept even finds a parallel in cutting-edge science of consciousness, where some theorists speculate about brain waves synchronizing or quantum coherence in neural networks as aspects of deep meditation and prayer. Without venturing into unfounded claims, it is nonetheless fascinating that empirical studies often show that regular prayer and meditation correlate with measurable changes in the brain and body (lower stress hormones, synchronized brain rhythms, etc.). It is as if the body itself responds to the resonance of prayer, tuning to a healthier state when aligned with transcendent focus. The faithful might say: when we pray, we plug into the source of all life, and that source nourishes and heals us according to a wisdom we may not fully comprehend.
The Song of Creation: Universal Worship in Poetic and Scientific Harmony
All around us, if we listen, creation is singing. The ancient Hebrews composed Psalm 148 as a rousing chorus: “Praise Him, sun and moon; praise Him, all you shining stars… Praise the LORD from the earth, you great sea creatures and all ocean depths, lightning and hail, snow and clouds, stormy winds that do His bidding, you mountains and all hills, fruit trees and all cedars, wild animals and all cattle, small creatures and flying birds…” (Psalm 148:3–10). This is not mere personification; it is profound insight. Every element of nature glorifies God simply by being itself, by playing its part in the divine order. The stars praise by shining, the winds by blowing, the birds by singing. Worship, then, is a universal act, not limited to human rituals, but performed ceaselessly by all beings and forces in their existence. We human beings join this cosmic liturgy with our deliberate songs and prayers. But even without our voices, the choir of creation would remain in full effect. Jesus once said (in the New Testament, though we avoid focusing on it) that if humans fell silent, “the stones would cry out.” In the Old Testament, Psalm 19:1 declares: “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands.” Day after day, the silent testimony of the universe goes forth. This idea finds a beautiful echo in scientific notions of harmony and pattern in nature. Physicists note that electrons in an atom occupy discrete energy levels, almost like musical notes. Planets orbit in stable resonant ratios at times (as with Jupiter’s moons). There is a rhythmic dance to ecosystems and even to the DNA that encodes life. Modern science has revealed a breathtaking order in natural complexity: the fractal geometry of coastlines and clouds, the harmonic oscillations of vibrating strings and electromagnetic fields, the self-similarity of branching trees and river deltas.
Fractal patterns especially illustrate how simple, iterative processes create magnificent complexity that is nonetheless unified by a theme. As one science writer observes, “Look closely at nature, and you’ll see a secret blueprint embedded in everything—from the spirals of galaxies to the branches of trees, from the neural pathways of our brain to the lightning that streaks across the sky. This blueprint is the fractal, a pattern that repeats at different scales, creating self-similar structures across the universe.” In other words, nature is full of echoes of itself, patterns that recur like the refrains of a song. The branching of an oak tree’s limbs resembles the branching of its roots, which resembles the branching of the veins in its leaves. The jagged outline of a coastline when seen from orbit looks like the edge of a small rock broken off that same coast. Fractal geometry has taught us that what looks like chaos often contains hidden order. This hidden order could be viewed as a fingerprint of the Creator’s intelligence, the signature melody beneath the noise. When a bird sings at dawn, it is performing its role in the grand fractal-harmony of life. The frequencies of its notes, the pattern of its refrain, join the rustling of leaves and the coursing of the brook in a unified anthem. One might even say all these sounds literally resonate in the air, creating the morning’s acoustic tapestry. Worship, in this expanded sense, is the alignment of all creatures with their true nature and purpose, which inevitably points back to the One who made them. The wind that blows where it pleases is fulfilling the word set for it by God (Psalm 148 calls even the stormy wind to praise God, “fulfilling His word”). The ocean waves praise by their ceaseless crashing, which, intriguingly, often follow patterns described by elegant mathematical equations. The concept of harmonic resonance appears not just in human instruments but in the physical interactions of nature at many levels. For example, electrons in a molecule can vibrate in synchrony (resonance modes), and planets in a solar system can lock into resonant orbits. It is as if the universe has been finely tuned to vibrate with beauty. Thus, when we humans lift our voices in hymns or bow in prayerful silence, we are joining an ongoing cosmic worship. We take our place in the pattern. Our music might have verses and choruses, but the cosmos has cycles and recurrences that accomplish the same rhythmic praise. Sunrise and sunset are like nature’s antiphonal chant, light and darkness answering each other. The seasons are a quartet of praise, spring’s new life, summer’s flourishing, autumn’s harvest, winter’s stillness, each giving thanks in its turn. Even the stars have their rhythm: pulsating stars literally sing with brightness oscillations, and binary stars dance around each other. In the Book of Job, God says that at creation’s dawn, “the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy.” The imagery suggests that creation began with a song, a notion delightful to both faith and imagination. Scientifically speaking, one could speculate that the very laws of physics are tuned such that complexity and life (and thus conscious praise) can emerge. This is reminiscent of the anthropic principle, which notes that fundamental constants in physics seem eerily well-suited for life to exist. If one believes in God, it’s easy to see this as intentional fine-tuning, the Creator setting the stage so that eventually creatures would arise who could know and worship Him explicitly, completing the circle of creation’s purpose. In any case, the more we learn about nature, the more we see consilience and resonance. As a commentator put it, “nature does not create randomness, it creates fractal order, even in what seems like chaos.” That hidden order could very well be the imprint of divine wisdom, the LOGOS spoken of in other traditions, which organizes reality. When I watch a flock of birds wheel in perfect unison, or a school of fish swirl as if one body, I am reminded of the unity underlying diversity. Many individuals move as one, a hint of the One Spirit moving within them. Similarly, humanity’s highest act of worship is often corporate, voices united in prayer or song, acting as one body. This too reflects the nature of God’s creation: many notes, one melody. In strict monotheism, God is singular, yet the expressions of God (in creation, revelation, action) are manifold. Worship seeks to gather the many and aim them toward the One in gratitude. In doing so, worship not only honors God but also harmonizes the worshippers. It brings them into resonance with each other as well, aligning hearts in a common purpose of love and reverence.
The Veiled Glory: Divine Presence and Hiddenness
Though God is present in all things, God’s full glory remains hidden to our ordinary sight. The Old Testament frequently speaks of God’s hiddenness, not as absence, but as unbearable presence. When Moses begged to see God’s face, the Lord gently refused, saying, “You cannot see My face, for no one may see Me and live”. Instead, Moses was granted a fleeting glimpse of God’s afterglow, as it were, “you will see My back; but My face shall not be seen”. In Exodus 33, Moses stands in the cleft of a rock while God’s glory passes by, and he sees just the trailing edge of the divine radiance. This poignant story illustrates a paradox: God is everywhere, yet God is cloaked in mystery. We see signs of God, like the passing shadow of His presence, but rarely do we perceive God directly. Why this hiddenness? One reason given is that mortal, limited creatures cannot handle the full intensity of the Infinite. It would be like trying to stare at the sun, our eyes are too weak. Thus, God in mercy veils Himself, showing only what we can bear. In the natural world, one might say God’s presence is filtered through physical forms and laws. We behold the beauty of the world, that is God’s back. We sense hints of guidance or flashes of insight in prayer, that is God’s voice heard faintly. Occasionally, there are moments of transcendence (a miracle, a prophetic vision), those are like God allowing a bit more of His glory to shine past the veil. But even then, it’s partial. As the Apostle Paul (much later) would write, “we see through a glass, darkly.” The glass is creation itself, it reflects God, but not with perfect clarity. The Old Testament also emphasizes that God sometimes chooses to hide His face because of human sin or to test faith. “Truly, you are a God who hides himself,” says Isaiah (45:15), in a context of God working in unexpected ways through King Cyrus. And in Deuteronomy 31:17–18, God warns that if Israel breaks the covenant, “I will hide My face from them.” This hiding is relational, a withdrawal of favor, not of actual presence (since God is still omnipresent). Even when God “hides,” He is still there, like the sun behind clouds, the light still exists even if we feel the chill shade. From a philosophical standpoint, the hiddenness of God also preserves human freedom and genuine faith. Were God’s presence blatantly obvious at all times, shining like a perpetual supernova, we might have no free choice but to worship out of sheer overpowering awe. By remaining subtle, God invites us to seek, to choose love rather than be coerced by spectacle. It is the glory of God to conceal a matter and the glory of kings (or humans) to search it out, says Proverbs 25:2. There is something divine in the quest itself, by searching for the hidden God, we elevate ourselves. The universe, then, is something of a divine hide-and-seek: God imbues every quark with His essence, leaves clues in the magnificence of the nebulae and the DNA double helix, speaks in hints and parables, and asks us to seek and find. Intriguingly, one might relate God’s hiddenness to the concept in physics that certain things are unobservable by nature. For example, we cannot simultaneously know a particle’s position and momentum exactly (Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle). There is a built-in veil in reality’s fabric. Likewise, the very center of a black hole (a singularity) is shrouded, no information escapes it. At the origin of the Big Bang, our equations break down, another veil. It is almost as if the fundamental truths have a protective cloud around them, hinting “beyond this, only mystery.” This does not prove anything theological, of course, but it provides a poetic parallel: there is a Cloud of Unknowing both spiritually and scientifically at the limits of our understanding. And perhaps behind those veils, the face of God smiles, waiting for the day when we are ready to behold more. Moses’ encounter with God also teaches that God gives us enough to trust, if not enough to comprehend fully. After Moses saw God’s “back,” he had the confidence to lead Israel forward, even though he had not grasped God’s full form. We too catch glimpses, moments of transcendence, answered prayers, inner consolations, or the witness of creation’s beauty, and these sustain our faith that the One is real and good. The prophet Elijah’s story further illustrates divine subtlety: God was not in the wind, earthquake, or fire, but in a “still, small voice” (1 Kings 19:11-13). The Almighty Presence manifested as a delicate whisper. The Hebrew phrase could be rendered “a sound of thin silence.” In the quiet, Elijah encountered God. This teaches us that to sense God’s immanent essence, we too must cultivate stillness and humility. God’s omnipresent essence is like a delicate background hum, if we fill our lives with noise, we drown it out. But in silent awe, we might discern that gentle resonance that is always there.
Conclusion: A Unified Vision of God, Life, and Cosmos
In the confluence of these threads, Old Testament theology, modern scientific cosmology, and metaphysical insight, emerges a unified and exhilarating vision: God is One, the Living Origin from which all existence springs forth and to which it ultimately returns. God’s own substance (for lack of a better word) is the fabric of reality; all beings are woven from the thread of divinity. The universe’s birth in a blaze of light was the outbreathing of the Creator, and its story across eons is the ongoing unfolding of that breath into myriad forms. What science calls the Big Bang, a soul can perceive as the moment when the Divine Word burst outward, and what science speculates as a possible Big Crunch or Big Bounce, a soul can hope in as the Divine Word drawing creation back into unity. Throughout this grand cycle, God’s presence fills every chapter. Not a sparrow falls apart from the Father (as Jesus would later note). Not a supernova explodes outside the allowance of the sustaining Logos. We have reconciled this not by conflating God with the universe (avoidance of crude pantheism), but by seeing the universe as emanating from God at every moment (a gentle panentheism, perhaps). Just as sunlight radiates from the sun and illuminates everything yet remains the sun’s light, so creation is the radiation of God’s being, distinct in one sense (a tree is not the Creator itself) yet utterly dependent and suffused (the tree lives by God’s life). In our paper, we moved fluidly between poetic first-person reverie, third-person philosophical discourse, and academic reasoning with citations. This mix of voices mirrors the very subject: the poetic speaks to the heart (for God is love and beauty), the philosophical speaks to the mind (for God is truth and reason), and the scientific/academic speaks to our empirical sense (for God is power and pattern, detectable even if indirectly). Seamlessly, we find they are not separate songs but three-part harmony praising the One. The poetry gave flesh to feeling, the mystic “I” breathing with God. The philosophy built logical bridges, how oneness implies omnipresence, how hiddenness preserves freedom. The science provided concrete support, seeing cosmic background radiation as evidence of a primordial “Fiat lux,” seeing quantum fields as analogous to an omnipresent spirit, seeing fractal and harmonic patterns as signatures of an intelligent unity. Each mode of discourse enriched the others. Ultimately, the unified concept presented is deeply monotheistic and holistic: God is the singular, omnipresent Essence and Creative Origin of all that exists. All physical matter is an expression of that divine energy; all life is animated by that divine breath. History and time are the stage on which God’s outbreath (creation) and inbreath (return) play out. Human beings, with our consciousness, find ourselves uniquely able to reflect on this and participate knowingly in the great dance. When we pray, we do so not to a distant sky-deity, but within the very field of God’s presence, like a fish praying in the ocean. When we seek knowledge, whether through science or meditation, we are thinking God’s thoughts after Him, exploring the patterns He set. When we act justly and love, we manifest God’s character, for moral truth is another strand of the one Essence (God’s goodness pervades moral order as surely as gravity pervades the galaxies). Such a worldview fosters profound reverence and unity. If God’s essence is in all, then there is a sacred value to every creature and every corner of the cosmos. It becomes natural to echo the ancient refrain: “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD God Almighty; the whole earth is full of His glory.” Our rational mind, our artistic soul, and our moral spirit can unite in worship of this God who is simultaneously the Author, Substance, and Goal of existence. We avoid New Testament doctrinal language in this treatise, sticking to the heritage of the Old Testament, yet we find that heritage sufficient and rich. In Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalmists, the seeds of this grand vision were already planted: One God, creator of all, giver of life’s breath, intimately near yet overwhelmingly great, deserving of all praise. Standing at night under the canopy of stars, I sense what Abraham felt, a wordless awe at the One who calls each star by name. Listening to the wind in the trees, I suspect what Job learned, that behind the forces of nature is One who speaks in the whirlwind. Living my daily life, I take comfort that, as the Psalmist sang, “You hem me in behind and before… Where can I flee from Your presence?” (Psalm 139). The answer (nowhere). And that is not a threat, but a promise. It means we are never alone; we live every second enveloped by the Being that is Love and Life itself. Everything that exists is a part of this magnificent divine symphony. The cosmos is not cold or alien at its core, its core is the warmth of God. As we continue to explore the galaxies and the subatomic depths, we are, in a way, exploring God’s body of manifestation. As we deepen in compassion and justice, we reveal God’s image in us. And as we worship, in trembling or in joy, we join the universal choir, fulfilling the purpose for which all was made. In the end, God is One and there is no other; and yet, by a miracle of grace, the One became the many so that the many might come to know the One. This is the unity of existence in God, the mystery that sanctifies every quark and every quasar, every heartbeat and every cry of the soul. It is a vision that can inspire endless scientific wonder, endless poetic hymns, and an unshakable philosophical foundation: All is from God, all lives through God, and all shall return to God, blessed be the Name of the One Creator, now and forever.
- The U.S. Opioid Crisis: A Timeline of Greed, Negligence, and Mass Destruction
The United States is in the grip of the worst drug overdose epidemic in its history; a catastrophe fueled not by a virus or a natural disaster, but by human avarice and institutional failure. A federal judge overseeing opioid litigation aptly described it as “a man-made plague, 20 years in the making” (1). Since 2000, more than one million Americans have died from drug overdoses, the majority caused by opioids (2). This crisis was entirely avoidable: it began with pharmaceutical companies aggressively pushing potent opioids for profit, was enabled by asleep-at-the-wheel regulators, and evolved as crackdowns on pills gave rise to a flood of heroin and illicit fentanyl. The result has been a public health calamity that has devastated families, destroyed communities, and left urban neighborhoods blighted by addiction. What follows is a chronological investigation of the actors and events that created the opioid nightmare; a blunt accounting of how corporate greed, regulatory incompetence, and criminal opportunism converged to unleash unprecedented suffering.
Purdue Pharma and the OxyContin Offensive
In the mid-1990s, Purdue Pharma; owned by the Sackler family; launched OxyContin, a new extended-release oxycodone pill. It was a calculated quest for profit: Purdue had learned that long-acting opioids could be a goldmine if marketed as safe for common pain. In 1995, the FDA approved OxyContin for moderate-to-severe pain, remarkably allowing Purdue to claim on the drug’s label that addiction to opioid painkillers was “very rare” when used properly. The label even suggested that OxyContin’s delayed absorption was “believed to reduce the abuse liability” of the drug; a claim with no scientific basis, which gave Purdue a green light to assure doctors the drug was less addictive (4). Armed with this federal blessing, Purdue mounted an unprecedented marketing blitz. The company doubled its sales force and showered physicians with glossy brochures, free coupons, and promotional swag (hats, tote bags, even OxyContin-branded CD music samples), all repeating the lie that opioid addiction was unlikely (4). Sales reps were trained to minimize doctors’ fears; they falsely asserted that OxyContin produced no euphoric high and caused no withdrawal symptoms; outright fabrications designed to overcome reluctance to prescribe a powerful opioid (3). As one U.S. Attorney later summarized, “OxyContin was the child of marketers and bottom-line financial decision-making,” not of medical science (3).
The results were as lucrative as they were lethal. Purdue’s aggressive marketing paid off in a surge of prescriptions: OxyContin sales exploded from about $48 million in 1996 to over $1.1 billion by the year 2000 (4). The drug was being handed out for all manner of aches and injuries, far beyond the cancer patients it was originally meant for. This flood of pills sparked a parallel surge in abuse and addiction. By 2004; less than a decade after its introduction; OxyContin had become one of the country’s most widely misused drugs, a staple on the black market and a scourge in rural Appalachia and other regions (4). Internal Purdue documents (unearthed years later) showed the Sackler family and executives knew early on about reports of OxyContin being crushed, snorted, and stolen, yet they continued to expand sales. The company’s mantra, “pain is undertreated,” cloaked a ruthless strategy to sell as much opioid as possible. Purdue incentivized high prescribing with lavish bonuses and even targeted “super-prescriber” doctors who doled out enormous quantities, including flagrant pill-mill operators. All the while, the Sacklers were reaping a fortune. Even after Purdue’s misconduct began coming to light, the Sackler family extracted over $10 billion from Purdue’s opioid profits between 2008 and 2017, funneling the money into trusts and overseas accounts (12). They cashed in while the epidemic of addiction they stoked engulfed American communities. In 2007, Purdue Pharma and three of its executives pleaded guilty in federal court to criminal charges of “misbranding” OxyContin and deceiving regulators and doctors about its addiction risks. Purdue paid $600 million in fines (a slap on the wrist given its revenues), and no one went to prison (3). The company’s official confession acknowledged that some employees had intentionally misled the medical community. But by then the damage was done; Purdue’s campaign of lies had already sown the seeds of a nationwide catastrophe.
Regulatory Failures: FDA and Government in the Pocket
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the agency charged with protecting public health; utterly failed to blow the whistle on the unfolding opioid disaster. In fact, FDA decisions actively enabled it. Approving OxyContin’s overly broad label in 1995 (with its false claims about low addiction risk) was the first egregious mistake. Even after reports of abuse poured in, the FDA was sluggish to act; it was not until 2001 that the agency finally forced Purdue to change OxyContin’s label, deleting the bogus “abuse deterrence” claim and warning of addiction; too late to un-ring the bell (4). Over the next decade, as prescription opioids flooded the country, the FDA and other regulators remained largely ineffectual, exhibiting what can only be described as regulatory capture and willful blindness. A presidential commission in 2017 identified “inadequate oversight by the Food and Drug Administration” as one cause of the opioid crisis (1). The FDA’s own former commissioner has publicly admitted the agency “was wrong” in allowing opioid makers to promote long-term use for chronic pain, a use never properly validated (1). Yet the FDA did little to rein in opioid marketing or require more rigorous proof of safety. By all accounts, the FDA’s opioid regulators were too cozy with industry; exemplified by an FDA medical reviewer who left the agency to take a lucrative job at Purdue shortly after OxyContin’s approval. The result was a watchdog that barely barked while opioid pills were handed out like candy. This dereliction of duty by the FDA allowed Purdue and its peers to spread disinformation virtually unchecked (1).
Other government actors were likewise asleep at the switch or, worse, complicit. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA); responsible for monitoring controlled substances; failed to stop obvious diversion of opioids to the black market. Giant drug distributors (like McKesson, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen) shipped millions of pills to tiny pharmacies in rural towns without scrutiny. For example, over a two-year period, nearly 9 million hydrocodone tablets were shipped to a single pharmacy in Kermit, West Virginia (population just 400 people); a colossal red flag that went ignored in the pursuit of profit. DEA officials later admitted they were slow to crack down on such rampant oversupply. Industry lobbying further neutered enforcement: in 2016, Congress (at the behest of pharmaceutical lobbyists) passed a law making it harder for the DEA to freeze suspicious opioid shipments, hobbling one of the agency’s key tools. In short, every institutional safeguard failed. State medical boards turned a blind eye to “pill mill” clinics pumping out prescriptions for cash. Politicians, courted by pharma money, were reluctant to impose strict limits on opioid prescribing until the crisis became undeniable. The oversight system that should have protected the public was effectively bought off or muzzled, clearing the way for opioid manufacturers and distributors to enrich themselves at the expense of American lives.
A Nation Awash in Pills (1999–2010)
Around 2010, belatedly, authorities began clamping down on the free-for-all of opioid prescribing. Law enforcement raided notorious pill mill clinics in states like Florida, shutting down sham pain clinics where lines of “patients” (many obviously addicted or diverting pills) stretched out the door. State governments implemented Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs to track opioid scripts and flag doctor-shopping. Purdue Pharma, under pressure, released a reformulated OxyContin in 2010 that was designed to be abuse-deterrent (harder to crush or dissolve for a quick high). The supply of prescription opioids finally tightened after a decade of glut. Prescriptions dropped by roughly 25% between 2012 and 2017 (5). This crackdown was necessary; but it had an unintended consequence that marked the second wave of the crisis. Thousands of people who had become addicted to prescription painkillers suddenly found those pills harder to get or too expensive. Cut off from one supply, they turned to a cheaper, readily available alternative: heroin.
Heroin, an illegal opioid, began flooding communities that had previously been hooked on OxyContin and Vicodin. By 2010, the U.S. saw a rapid rise in heroin overdose deaths, signaling this new phase (1). Mexican drug cartels seized the opportunity; they ramped up heroin production and distribution to meet the burgeoning demand from America’s prescription-opioid refugees. In fact, Mexican heroin output surged dramatically; increasing six-fold between 2005 and 2009; to feed the U.S. market (5). People who might never have imagined themselves injecting street heroin were now doing so, having first gotten addicted to opioid pills supplied by the pharmaceutical industry. Studies showed that roughly 4 out of 5 new heroin users had started by misusing prescription opioids (6). This is a damning statistic that directly links the overprescription of painkillers to the explosion of heroin use; the vast majority of heroin addicts in the 2010s began their opioid journey in a doctor’s office on supposedly “safe” meds (6). As pill supplies dried up, heroin was often easier and cheaper to obtain; a bag of heroin could be less costly than a single OxyContin tablet on the black market. By 2014, heroin had firmly entrenched itself in the suburbs and rural areas, not just the inner cities where it had long been present. Overdose deaths involving heroin tripled nationally from 2010 to 2015. Families that once faced a loved one’s prescription pill habit now faced the horror of heroin addiction, with all its associated dangers (injection-related diseases like HIV/hepatitis, risk of violent drug markets, etc.).
It’s important to note that this shift was entirely predictable; yet authorities did little to prepare. There was scant investment in addiction treatment or medication-assisted therapy to help those dependent on opioids. Instead of viewing the issue as a public health crisis, the system largely treated it as a law-and-order problem, cutting off the supply of pills and leaving addicted individuals to fend for themselves. Many ended up dead as a result. The crackdown on prescription opioids, while curbing new cases of painkiller addiction, left behind a generation of opioid-dependent people who simply migrated to illicit heroin. In essence, one type of opioid epidemic morphed into another. And an even deadlier twist was about to come.
Crackdown and the Shift to Heroin (2010–2013)
Around 2010, belatedly, authorities began clamping down on the free-for-all of opioid prescribing. Law enforcement raided notorious pill mill clinics in states like Florida, shutting down sham pain clinics where lines of “patients” (many obviously addicted or diverting pills) stretched out the door. State governments implemented Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs to track opioid scripts and flag doctor-shopping. Purdue Pharma, under pressure, released a reformulated OxyContin in 2010 that was designed to be abuse-deterrent (harder to crush or dissolve for a quick high). The supply of prescription opioids finally tightened after a decade of glut. Prescriptions dropped by roughly 25% between 2012 and 2017 (5). This crackdown was necessary – but it had an unintended consequence that marked the second wave of the crisis. Thousands of people who had become addicted to prescription painkillers suddenly found those pills harder to get or too expensive. Cut off from one supply, they turned to a cheaper, readily available alternative: heroin.
Heroin, an illegal opioid, began flooding communities that had previously been hooked on OxyContin and Vicodin. By 2010, the U.S. saw a rapid rise in heroin overdose deaths, signaling this new phase (1). Mexican drug cartels seized the opportunity: they ramped up heroin production and distribution to meet the burgeoning demand from America’s prescription-opioid refugees. In fact, Mexican heroin output surged dramatically – increasing six-fold between 2005 and 2009 – to feed the U.S. market (5). People who might never have imagined themselves injecting street heroin were now doing so, having first gotten addicted to opioid pills supplied by the pharmaceutical industry. Studies showed that roughly 4 out of 5 new heroin users had started by misusing prescription opioids (6). This is a damning statistic that directly links the overprescription of painkillers to the explosion of heroin use – the vast majority of heroin addicts in the 2010s began their opioid journey in a doctor’s office on supposedly “safe” meds (6). As pill supplies dried up, heroin was often easier and cheaper to obtain; a bag of heroin could be less costly than a single OxyContin tablet on the black market. By 2014, heroin had firmly entrenched itself in the suburbs and rural areas, not just the inner cities where it had long been present. Overdose deaths involving heroin tripled nationally from 2010 to 2015. Families that once faced a loved one’s prescription pill habit now faced the horror of heroin addiction, with all its associated dangers (injection-related diseases like HIV/hepatitis, risk of violent drug markets, etc.).
It’s important to note that this shift was entirely predictable – yet authorities did little to prepare. There was scant investment in addiction treatment or medication-assisted therapy to help those dependent on opioids. Instead of viewing the issue as a public health crisis, the system largely treated it as a law-and-order problem, cutting off the supply of pills and leaving addicted individuals to fend for themselves. Many ended up dead as a result. The crackdown on prescription opioids, while curbing new cases of painkiller addiction, left behind a generation of opioid-dependent people who simply migrated to illicit heroin. In essence, one type of opioid epidemic morphed into another. And an even deadlier twist was about to come.
The Rise of Illicit Fentanyl: A Third, Deadlier Wave
Just as the heroin surge was taking off, a new killer opioid entered the scene; one far more potent and insidious than the rest. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid up to 50 times stronger than heroin, began appearing in the U.S. illicit drug supply around 2013. This signaled the start of the third wave of the opioid crisis (1). Initially, fentanyl was often mixed into heroin to boost its strength or pressed into counterfeit painkiller pills and sold to unwitting users. Because fentanyl is so powerful in tiny doses, these practices proved extraordinarily lethal. Overdose deaths skyrocketed yet again. From 2013 onward, the U.S. saw exponential increases in fatalities driven by illicit fentanyl and its analogues. By the late 2010s, synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) had become the number one cause of opioid overdose deaths, surpassing both prescription opioids and heroin. In 2022, fentanyl and its analogs were involved in an estimated two-thirds of all drug overdose deaths in America (2).
Why is fentanyl so deadly? As a lab-made drug, it can be produced cheaply and in massive quantities. Microgram-for-microgram, it delivers extreme potency; a few grains the size of salt can kill an adult. Traffickers embraced fentanyl because it is highly profitable and easier to smuggle (small packages can contain thousands of doses). But for users, it’s a game of Russian roulette: when someone buys a bag of heroin or a pill on the street today, it likely contains fentanyl, and the potency is wildly inconsistent. A dose they tolerate one day can silently be a fatal overdose the next. The result has been carnage. The period from 2015 to 2020 saw overall U.S. overdose deaths double, driven almost entirely by fentanyl infiltrating the drug supply. By 2021–2022, around 80,000 Americans were dying each year from opioid overdoses, with fentanyl responsible for the majority of those deaths (2). That is the equivalent of a 737 airplane full of people crashing every single day. The COVID-19 pandemic only worsened the trend, as isolation and disrupted treatment made many struggling individuals more vulnerable; 2020 and 2021 each set grim record highs for overdose fatalities. Although provisional data suggest deaths may have plateaued at this high level, the country is essentially enduring a 9/11-scale death toll from drugs every few weeks; year after year.
The influx of illicit fentanyl was not an accident of nature; it was engineered by drug trafficking enterprises exploiting America’s entrenched opioid demand. Early on, much of the illicit fentanyl was being manufactured in China and shipped directly to the U.S. via mail. Taking advantage of weak regulations and the anonymity of internet sales, Chinese chemical labs openly sold fentanyl powder and analogues to American customers or middlemen. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration confirmed that as of the mid-2010s, China was the primary source of illicit fentanyl flowing into the United States (8). In response to U.S. pressure, China nominally banned fentanyl and its core analogues in 2019, but clever chemists simply shifted to manufacturing precursor chemicals and novel analogues not on the banned list. These precursors are the ingredients needed to make fentanyl, and they soon began flowing in huge volumes to Mexico.
The Global Supply Chain: Chinese Labs and Mexican Cartels
Behind the surge of street fentanyl lies a global network of profit-driven criminals who stepped in to supply opioids after U.S. corporations’ pill gravy train slowed. Chinese chemical manufacturers and Mexican drug cartels became key players, effectively partnering (albeit at arm’s length) to keep Americans drowning in cheap, deadly opioids. As one U.S. official bluntly put it, “the global fentanyl supply chain, which ends with the deaths of Americans, often starts with chemical companies in China” (7). These Chinese firms, operating with impunity, mass-produce fentanyl precursors and even finished fentanyl, then sell them through black-market channels. According to the DEA, Chinese chemical companies are “fueling the fentanyl crisis” in the United States by sending fentanyl precursors and analogues in enormous quantities, either directly or via Mexico (7). Shipments of these chemicals are frequently mislabeled and routed through various countries to evade detection. Despite diplomatic efforts, China’s enforcement against these outlaw labs has been minimal; likely because these companies make money and the casualties are an ocean away.
On the receiving end of those precursor chemicals, Mexico’s major drug cartels have built a booming fentanyl manufacturing and trafficking operation. The Sinaloa Cartel (formerly helmed by Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán and now partly run by his sons) and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) are the two dominant players. They have established clandestine labs in Mexico that can churn out fentanyl by the kilo, which is then pressed into millions of fake pills (often made to look like Xanax, Percocet or other popular meds) or mixed into batches of heroin, cocaine, and even stimulants. The DEA reports that the Sinaloa and CJNG cartels are the primary groups responsible for flooding the U.S. with illicit fentanyl; nearly every significant fentanyl seizure or lab bust can be traced back to these organizations (8). These cartels have capitalized on fentanyl because it is far more profitable than plant-based drugs. Whereas heroin requires hectares of poppy cultivation and a large workforce, fentanyl can be cooked in an industrial vat anywhere. The cartels’ business model is straightforward: produce mass quantities of fentanyl-laced pills for pennies per pill, and smuggle them into the U.S. hidden among legal commerce or carried by drug mules. From 2018 onward, U.S. authorities have interdicted shocking amounts of fentanyl at the southern border; multi-kilogram loads, each kilogram containing half a million lethal doses. In just a few months in 2022, the DEA seized over 10 million fentanyl pills and almost a thousand pounds of fentanyl powder, which combined equated to hundreds of millions of potentially fatal doses removed from circulation. This gives a sense of the scale of product the cartels are pushing into the country. Undoubtedly, much more gets through, and is sold on street corners from Los Angeles to Boston. The cartels have shown complete disregard for the lives lost; for them, every American who develops a fentanyl habit is simply a repeat customer (until they overdose and die, at which point the dealers move on to the next victim). The partnership of Chinese chemical suppliers and Mexican trafficking networks ensured that when America tried to clamp down on one opioid source (pills), an even deadlier source took its place; truly pouring gasoline on the fire that U.S. pharma ignited.
Communities Devastated: Homelessness, Orphans, and Urban Decay
After more than two decades, the opioid crisis has left an appalling trail of human wreckage. This public health disaster has deeply scarred the social fabric of America. Consider the families: hundreds of thousands of parents have lost children to opioid overdoses, and many thousands of children have lost parents. An entire generation of Americans has grown up during this epidemic; in some communities, attending multiple funerals for classmates or neighbors who overdosed became distressingly routine. In the hardest-hit areas, the local economies and way of life have been upended. Factories and coal mines closed in parts of Appalachia right as OxyContin swept through, leading to a vicious cycle of joblessness and addiction. Indeed, research has linked opioid prevalence to drops in labor force participation; people in their prime working years incapacitated by addiction (1). And when breadwinners succumb to drugs, their families often fall into poverty or disintegrate. Many grandparents unexpectedly became primary caregivers to grandchildren because the middle generation was wiped out by opioids. Child welfare systems overflowed with kids whose parents were addicted or dead. The foster care rolls swelled in many states as the crisis peaked.
In U.S. cities, one of the most visible signs of the opioid plague is the surge in homelessness and open-air drug use. Urban neighborhoods like Kensington in Philadelphia have become notorious as lawless heroin/fentanyl encampments, resembling something out of a post-apocalyptic film. The streets of Kensington are lined with dozens of emaciated, addicted individuals huddled around barrel fires, tents and makeshift shelters crowding the sidewalks, needles and trash littering the ground. The area has been dubbed the East Coast’s largest open-air drug market, a place where the opioid and now fentanyl crisis is on full display at all hours. An estimated 75% of people living unsheltered in the Kensington neighborhood suffer from substance use disorder, primarily opioid addiction (11). Similar scenes play out on the West Coast: parts of San Francisco’s Tenderloin district or Los Angeles’s skid row have seen an influx of fentanyl, contributing to spikes in overdoses among the homeless population. Nationwide, the interplay between homelessness and the opioid epidemic is profound. Studies have found that homelessness itself greatly increases the risk of drug overdose death; one analysis showed that a mere 10% reduction in the homeless population could save over 650 lives a year from opioid overdoses, while a 25% reduction could save nearly 2,000 lives (9). In other words, the opioid crisis and the housing crisis are feeding one another, creating a deadly feedback loop (homelessness exacerbates addiction, and addiction in turn causes homelessness).
Beyond the human toll, entire communities have been gutted by opioids. Small towns in West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky lost so many residents to overdose or drug-related decay that they are a shell of what they once were. In some counties, ambulance crews have reversed more overdoses with Narcan than they transport heart attack victims; a grim new normal straining local resources. Businesses in affected downtowns struggle to survive amid the crime and disorder accompanying heavy drug use; many storefronts stand vacant. Public spaces; parks, libraries, transit stations; have at times become hazard zones with frequent overdoses and drug dealing in plain sight, discouraging general public use and eroding quality of life. The crisis also placed an immense burden on healthcare systems: hospitals saw soaring admissions for overdose, endocarditis (a heart infection common in IV drug users), and other complications; coroners’ offices ran out of space for the bodies. The economic cost of the opioid epidemic is almost incalculable; factoring health care, law enforcement, lost productivity, and societal costs, a Congressional analysis estimated the cost at $1.5 trillion for just the year 2020 (10). Cumulatively, some studies put the economic burden in the multiple trillions over the past decade. But even these staggering dollar figures pale in comparison to the incalculable human cost; the trauma and grief of millions of families, the neighborhoods plunged into despair, the potential and promise of so many lives cut short.
Profit and Power: Incentives Behind the Carnage
How did this disaster happen in an advanced nation with regulatory agencies and a sophisticated healthcare system? The blunt answer: every key actor’s incentives were aligned toward making money or gaining power at the expense of public health. The opioid crisis is a case study in perverse incentives and moral failures. It started with pharmaceutical companies like Purdue, whose incentive was simple: profit above all. The Sackler family and Purdue’s executives knew that turning OxyContin into a blockbuster would make them fabulously wealthy. So they deliberately expanded the opioid market; pushing opioids for chronic ailments, downplaying risks, and even blaming patients when they became addicted (Purdue infamously coined the term “pseudoaddiction,” claiming that apparent drug-seeking was actually undertreatment of pain requiring more opioids). This was greed in its purest form. Internal emails revealed callous strategies, like one Sackler executive suggesting they “hammer on the abusers” as reckless criminals to deflect blame from the drug and company. The billions the Sacklers pocketed (over $10 billion withdrawn from Purdue, as noted) were essentially blood money earned by spreading addiction (12). Other drug companies (Johnson & Johnson, Endo, Teva, Mallinckrodt, etc.) joined the fray with their own opioids or by supplying raw ingredients, all profiting from increased opioid sales. For the drug makers, more prescriptions meant more revenue; any downside was someone else’s problem.
Next are the regulators and government agencies. Agencies like the FDA had an incentive (or at least strong pressure) to approve new pain drugs and not stifle the pharmaceutical industry; in part because of industry influence and a political climate favoring faster drug approvals. The FDA gets significant funding from industry user fees, which critics say can make it “client-friendly” toward the companies it regulates. Their leaders likely feared political blowback or lawsuits if they limited access to pain treatment. Whatever the case, the FDA’s failure to act suggests that protecting consumers was not prioritized over keeping industry happy. The DEA and big distributors also had skewed incentives: for distributors, shipping more pills meant more profit, and their executives often earned bonuses based on sales volume. They had every reason not to look too hard at suspicious orders. The DEA, for its part, faced internal and external pressure to balance enforcement with ensuring medications for pain were available; a balance they disastrously mismanaged on the lenient side. Some DEA officials later took jobs in the pharmaceutical sector, raising questions of revolving-door incentives.
Many doctors and pharmacies were likewise swept up by perverse incentives. Most physicians certainly didn’t intend harm; they were reassured by Purdue’s information that opioids were safe, and they wanted to alleviate pain (and in America’s fee-for-service system, writing a prescription is quick and reimbursed, whereas spending time on complex pain management is not). Pill mill doctors, however, were outright drug dealers in lab coats, motivated by easy cash from churning through dozens of patients a day and writing high-dose opioid scripts for anyone who could pay. Small-town pharmacies in places like West Virginia saw their business boom by dispensing huge volumes of opioids; owners often looked the other way and enjoyed the profits. Corporate pharmacy chains also benefited from increased traffic and sales. Until lawsuits and public outrage forced their hand, they had little financial incentive to question high opioid prescription rates; to do so might mean losing customers to a competitor.
When the crisis shifted to illicit drugs, the incentives driving the devastation remained just as ruthless. Mexican cartels are motivated by profit and power. For them, fentanyl is a godsend: they can produce it cheaply without relying on crop cycles, and it creates strong physiological dependency in users (meaning returning customers). The calculus is cold-blooded: even if fentanyl kills a chunk of their client base, there will always be new users coming up; and the profit margins are so high that it offsets the loss. In fact, some cartel factions weaponized fentanyl as a strategy to expand market share, flooding areas with super-potent product to eliminate competition, heedless of the overdose deaths caused. The Chinese chemical suppliers are similarly money-driven. Often operating in a gray area of Chinese law, these companies and brokers make enormous sums supplying precursors. There is virtually no consequence for them since they operate abroad; thus their incentive is purely to sell more chemicals. Some have even marketed new fentanyl analogues with slogans about how potent or effective they are; acting as pseudo-pharma companies with zero regulation.
Even at the level of governance and policy, incentives were misaligned or politics got in the way. For years, some lawmakers were reluctant to crack down hard on opioid manufacturers or fund treatment programs; campaign donations from pharma and a general ideological resistance to government intervention played a role. The result was a toothless initial response. Only once the crisis became a national scandal did politicians pivot, by which time it was too late to prevent the cascade of heroin and fentanyl. Meanwhile, early victims of the opioid surge were often working-class, rural, or otherwise marginalized communities, and one cannot ignore that there was likely a lack of urgency in the halls of power because of who was suffering (had the early wave been Wall Street bankers dying en masse, the response might have been more swift). In short, no one with the power to stop the opioid epidemic had a strong enough incentive to do so at the time it mattered. Corporations wanted money, regulators didn’t want to upset corporate interests, traffickers wanted to create and supply more addicts, and the victims; everyday Americans struggling with pain or addiction; had little voice or influence. By the time the alarms rang loud, millions were already hooked and hundreds of thousands were dead. This was not a well-meaning policy gone awry or a tragic unforeseen side effect; it was the predictable outcome when profit and greed override ethics at every step.
Conclusion: A Catastrophe with Clear Villains
The U.S. opioid crisis did not have to happen; it was the result of deliberate actions (and deliberate inactions) by identifiable actors. In a just world, these actors would face harsh accountability for the lives destroyed. The pharmaceutical executives who cynically marketed opioids as safe, the Sackler family that built a dynasty of wealth by igniting mass addiction, the FDA officials and policymakers who fell under the sway of industry or failed to do their due diligence, the distributors and pharmacies that turned a blind eye to blatant drug diversion, and the foreign crime syndicates that pumped lethal poison into vulnerable communities; all of them share blame for an American tragedy. Together, they transformed the landscape of American public health, creating what the CDC has called the worst drug epidemic in our history (1). The numbers speak to a historic calamity: over 700,000 opioid overdose deaths since 1999 (2), overall drug fatalities topping 100,000 per year, life expectancy in the U.S. declining in recent years largely due to these deaths. But beyond the numbers are the stories; millions of individuals suffering from addiction, families shattered by grief, towns and cities plunged into an interminable nightmare of funeral vigils and emergency sirens.
What sets the opioid epidemic apart is that it was manufactured for profit. This wasn’t an accident or an epidemic that emerged organically; it was driven by greed every step of the way. We must be unequivocal on this point: the crisis was man-made. The “opioid plague” did not descend upon America randomly; it was ushered in by the pharmaceutical industry’s lies and stoked by systemic failures and illicit profiteering. It’s a cautionary tale of what happens when corporate power, regulatory weakness, and illicit enterprise collide. Even today, as we grapple with the fentanyl era, those same forces remain in play. The institutions meant to protect the public must reckon with their abdication of responsibility. And society at large must contend with the aftermath; an entire generation scarred, and communities that will take decades to recover, if they ever do.
There is nothing abstract about the devastation: one can walk through certain neighborhoods in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, or California and see the hollowed-out houses, the memorials in church yards, the faces of children growing up without parents. The opioid crisis is as real and as ugly as it gets. And it was made possible by named individuals and organizations that chose profit, expediency, or indifference over human life. Any attempt to sugarcoat this reality would be an insult to the victims. The United States is only now starting to hold some of these parties to account through lawsuits and settlements (billions in damages have been levied, Purdue Pharma was forced into bankruptcy, some cartel leaders have been indicted). But no amount of money can truly compensate for the scale of harm done. The opioid crisis will forever remain a dark stain on America’s recent history; a lethal convergence of avarice and ineptitude that unleashed untold suffering. It stands as a stark lesson that when corporate and government institutions betray the public trust, the consequences can be catastrophic. And it demands that we remain unflinchingly critical of those whose actions; or failures to act; lead to such colossal loss of life.
Sources:
- Kolodny, Andrew. “How FDA Failures Contributed to the Opioid Crisis.” AMA Journal of Ethics, vol. 22, no. 8, Aug. 2020. (Includes quotes from a federal judge calling the opioid epidemic a “man-made plague” and cites inadequate FDA oversight as a cause of the crisis.)
- Ferragamo, Mariel, and Claire Klobucista. “Fentanyl and the U.S. Opioid Epidemic.” Council on Foreign Relations Backgrounder, updated 28 Mar. 2025. (Provides an overview of the opioid crisis, noting over one million overdose deaths since 2000 and that recent fatalities are largely driven by fentanyl, with most supply coming from China and Mexico.)
- Zarroli, Jim. “OxyContin Addiction Case Yields Millions in Fines.” NPR News, 10 May 2007. (Reports on Purdue Pharma’s 2007 guilty plea for misbranding OxyContin; includes U.S. Attorney John Brownlee’s statement that OxyContin was “the child of marketers and bottom-line financial decision-making,” and details how Purdue misled doctors about addiction risks.)
- Van Zee, Art. “The Promotion and Marketing of OxyContin: Commercial Triumph, Public Health Tragedy.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 99, no. 2, Feb. 2009. (Documents Purdue’s aggressive marketing of OxyContin, noting sales grew from $48 million in 1996 to $1.1 billion in 2000, and that OxyContin became a leading drug of abuse by 2004. Also discusses the FDA-approved labeling that claimed addiction was “very rare” and that OxyContin’s delayed release reduced abuse potential – statements removed in 2001 as evidence of abuse mounted.)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). “Prescription Opioids and Heroin Research Report: Increased drug availability is associated with increased use and overdose.” NIDA/NIH, accessed 2022. (Explains that opioid prescriptions dispensed by U.S. pharmacies more than tripled from 76 million in 1991 to 255 million in 2012, and that in parallel, opioid-involved overdose deaths quadrupled. Also notes a decline in prescriptions to ~143 million by 2020 after reforms.)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). “Prescription Opioids DrugFacts.” NIDA/NIH, revised 2020. (States that about 80% of people who use heroin first misused prescription opioids. This data illustrates the progression from prescription opioid abuse to heroin use for a large share of individuals, highlighting how the crackdowns on pills led to a shift toward heroin.)
- U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Public Affairs. “Justice Department Announces Eight Indictments Against China-Based Chemical Manufacturing Companies and Employees.” Press Release, 3 Oct. 2023. (Quotes Attorney General Merrick Garland and DEA Administrator Anne Milgram on Chinese companies fueling the fentanyl crisis by exporting precursor chemicals and analogues. Milgram explicitly says, “Chinese chemical companies are fueling the fentanyl crisis in the United States by sending fentanyl precursors… into our country and into Mexico,” underscoring China’s role in the supply chain.)
- U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). DEA Intelligence Report: Fentanyl Flow to the United States. Published March 2020. (Details how Mexico and China are the primary sources of illicit fentanyl. Notes that Mexican transnational criminal organizations, specifically the Sinaloa Cartel and Jalisco New Generation Cartel, are the primary trafficking groups responsible for smuggling fentanyl into the U.S., either by producing it in Mexico using precursors from China or distributing finished fentanyl from China.)
- Hataway, Leigh. “Homelessness leads to more drug, alcohol poisoning deaths.” UGA Today (University of Georgia News), 5 Feb. 2024. (Summarizes a study published in Health Affairs. Finds that higher homelessness rates are associated with higher overdose death rates. Notably, it
- China In Turmoil
China is straining at every seam.
Street violence and social fray
Mass knife attacks, arson incidents, and vehicle assaults now appear in state media feeds almost every week. Police scramble everywhere. Citizens film, children run. Chaos feels constant, normal even. In November, an SUV rammed pupils outside a primary school in Changde, injuring several and causing widespread panic【(2)】. Parents screamed, teachers wept openly in the streets. Reporters counted at least a dozen deadly incidents just in that month alone. Earlier coverage traced a rise nationwide in random killings and stabbings, framed chillingly by attackers as “revenge against society”【(1)】.
People are angry, scared, exhausted. Some blame rising tuition prices, others blame mass layoffs. Everyone whispers the same bleak phrase: no future. Authorities scramble to reassure the public, yet reassurance rings hollow and fake.
Factories stall, wallets thin
Orders for low margin exporters have dried up entirely under new United States tariffs. Dongguan plants that once hummed constantly now sit dark, eerie, and abandoned. Owners weigh whether running at a loss is better than shutting the gate forever【(3)】. A Financial Times report reveals similar shutdown waves across Jiangsu and Zhejiang, regions once hailed as China’s industrial backbone, now faltering and struggling【(4)】.
Why so brittle? Because many workshops borrow cash heavily after only a tiny ten percent deposit. Cancelled order equals instant default. Workers dismissed with nothing, some lingering desperately outside gates, holding placards demanding unpaid wages. Beijing understands clearly what unpaid and angry men might do.
Premier Li Keqiang openly admitted back in 2020 that six hundred million Chinese scrape by daily on under five U.S. dollars【(5)】. Four years later, food prices have surged upward dramatically. Wages have remained stagnant, unchanged. Workers skip meals, miss bus rides, cut essentials down to the bare bones.
Property offers no financial cushion anymore. Resale home prices fell another seven percent year on year in April, marking the worst slide since the 1990s【(18)】. Big developer Vanke saw its chief executive reportedly detained in January, shaking an industry already drowning deep in debt【(17)】. Mortgage boycott chat groups, once strictly censored, are quietly surging again. Homeowners openly question, angrily demand answers, but mostly face deafening silence.
Economic data itself is vanishing mysteriously. Entire economic series such as steel output, land sales, and youth employment have been yanked offline or “rebenchmarked,” leaving analysts blind and guessing【(16)】. When numbers hide, trouble looms large.
Lost generation
The official youth jobless rate hit twenty one percent in mid 2023, then the government abruptly stopped publishing it. A recalculated figure still showed seventeen percent in July 2024, and academics argue the real number today would be even higher【(9)】.
Online, thousands of basement dwellers label themselves “rat people,” openly bragging about days spent endlessly scrolling and eating instant noodles in dark, windowless rooms【(8)】. Their cynical motto: scroll, eat, sleep, repeat. They see no point whatsoever in fighting for lengthy mortgages or endless twelve hour shifts. Despair has become an accepted lifestyle, memeable yet profoundly troubling.
Party fears its own citizens
Beijing’s public security budget surpassed the army budget as early as 2011 and continues climbing sharply【(6)】. Cameras, police vans, neighborhood watch apps—every city block becomes a checkpoint. The threat the Party fears most is domestic rebellion. Loyalty questioned, trust eroded, paranoia spreads rapidly. Citizens watch each other suspiciously, wondering silently who might report whom next.
The People’s Liberation Army slips
Purges at the top
April brought another shocking revelation: reports emerged that CMC vice chair General He Weidong had been removed—the first ouster at this rank since the chaotic Cultural Revolution【(10)】. At least seventy eight senior officers have fallen in Xi’s aggressive anti corruption campaign. Officers watch their mentors vanish, nervously wondering who might be next. Loyalty tests grow stricter, careers ruined overnight.
Exercises cut short
The PLA staged extensive drills around Taiwan on April 1–2, then abruptly ended them early. Analysts noticed missing commanders and muddled messages, signs of a force improvising without trusted, clear leadership【(11)】. Troops questioned orders openly, discipline frayed visibly, uncertainty ruled the ranks.
Gear that will not work
U.S. intelligence uncovered missiles filled shockingly with water inside Rocket Force silos, a scandal that helped trigger the extensive purge【(12)】. Satellite images later exposed a brand new nuclear submarine sunk embarrassingly at its pier near Wuhan during critical trials—costly and humiliating【(13)】. Export customers complain frequently: cracked JF17 airframes, radar malfunctions, engine breakdowns are common【(14)】. If foreign buyers suffer, the PLA undoubtedly struggles too.
Recruiting slump
Urban youth strongly prefer tech gigs or delivery scooters over restrictive barracks life. Provincial officials have responded desperately by reviving clauses from the 1984 Military Service Law, forcibly ordering high school and university students into mandatory boot camps【(15)】. Parents protest quietly but fearfully. The desperation for manpower is increasingly clear, morale sinking even lower.
Morale overall? Thin, very thin. Officers regularly fake readiness reports to pass inspections. Soldiers study political slogans more intently than real combat drills. Trust evaporates, replaced swiftly by suspicion and fear.
Why it matters
A fraying society, faltering economy, and nervous army together form a grim picture. Beijing’s grand plans—from projecting power strongly in the South China Sea to deterring rivals near Taiwan—depend heavily on domestic strength. Right now, that critical foundation looks severely cracked.
The world is watching closely, hedge funds especially. So are millions inside China, scrolling mindlessly in dim, rented rooms, anxiously waiting for tomorrow, uncertain what will break first.
- Waco: Thirty Two Years and Still No Justice
Six days ago marked the thirty second anniversary of one of the most disgusting abuses of government power in American history. Waco was not a tragic accident. It was cold-blooded murder carried out by federal agencies against civilians, twenty five of them children. It was a flex of unchecked authority against the most vulnerable. Seventy six Americans died because government agents decided that saving face was more important than saving lives. No one paid the price. Instead, the agencies responsible were rewarded and expanded.
False Accusations and First Blood
The ATF needed a high-profile win to justify its bloated budget and fading reputation. They launched a raid under false claims that the Branch Davidians were stockpiling illegal machine guns. No such weapons were ever found. This was not law enforcement. It was a premeditated attack.
Federal agents fired the first shots—not at armed men, but at penned dogs in the kennel. The sounds of gunfire triggered a firefight that never had to happen. ATF gunmen then opened fire on the building itself. Court evidence showed bullets hitting the front door from the outside. That front door, entered into evidence, somehow “disappeared” while in government custody, conveniently preventing a full accounting of who shot first.
This was not a misunderstanding. It was an ambush. It was violence chosen over restraint.
Fifty One Days of Torture
When the initial assault failed, the FBI took command and escalated the war against civilians. They cut off water and power. They blasted recordings of screaming rabbits and deafening noise through the nights. They moved tanks around the compound to terrorize the people inside, many of whom were women, children, and unarmed civilians.
The psychological abuse was not an accident. It was deliberate. The goal was to break the people inside, to humiliate them, to make an example of them for the nation to see.
On April 19, the government made its final move. Tanks punched holes into the building and pumped in CS gas mixed with methylene chloride—a chemical banned in warfare for its lethal effects in confined spaces. They knew the risks. They did it anyway.
Fire, Death, and the Massacre of Innocents
Shortly after the gas assault began, fires broke out across the compound. Government agents immediately blamed the Davidians. Yet infrared footage captured gunfire directed into the buildings. Audio recordings caught FBI agents discussing the use of pyrotechnic rounds.
Seventy six people were killed.
Twenty five of them were children.Children died from suffocation. Children were crushed when tanks collapsed the walls. Children burned alive because the FBI created a chemical furnace and locked the doors behind them. They had no chance. They were sacrificed to preserve federal pride.
Suppression of Evidence and Official Lies
Key evidence disappeared.
The front door.
Shell casings.
Sections of FBI surveillance tapes.
All conveniently lost, destroyed, or sealed away from public view.The same agencies that murdered children then declared themselves innocent, and the media parroted every word without question. No serious prosecutions ever took place. No real reforms ever followed. The government closed ranks to protect itself, not the people it serves.
Congressional Hearings: Protecting the Murderers
In 1995, Congress pretended to investigate Waco.
Chuck Schumer, then a House Representative, defended the actions of the ATF and FBI and mocked demands for accountability. Today he is the Senate Majority Leader.
Charles Grassley, a rare voice demanding real answers, remains a Senator but was drowned out at the time by political cover-ups.
Joe Biden, then a Senator, fully backed the federal assault and blamed the victims for their own deaths.
The hearings were nothing but political theater to shield the guilty. Those who demanded justice were sidelined. Those who covered it up rose to the highest offices in the land.
Koresh’s Crimes Do Not Excuse Mass Murder
David Koresh was a tyrant inside the compound. He committed statutory rape and controlled his followers with cult tactics. But Koresh’s crimes were no justification for the mass extermination of everyone living under his roof. That is not how justice works. That is not how free nations treat their citizens.
The Branch Davidians were not a violent army. They were a community of families, veterans, workers, and believers. They were racially diverse, welcoming Black, white, Asian, and Hispanic members. Many stayed because they believed surrender meant death. They were right.
What Waco Really Means
Waco showed the world that American citizens can be gassed, crushed, and burned alive by their own government with total impunity. It showed that federal agencies can destroy evidence, lie to the public, and still be praised and funded.
It showed that the murder of twenty five children does not spark mass resignations, arrests, or shame in Washington. It showed that government will always protect itself before it ever protects you.
Waco was not an accident. Waco was not an unfortunate mistake.
Waco was the state flexing its power by killing the weak to send a message to everyone else.Thirty two years later, the blood of seventy six innocent Americans still stains the hands of the ATF, the FBI, and every politician who helped bury the truth.
And we have not forgotten.
Sources
- U.S. House of Representatives Hearings on Waco, 1995 – Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
- Department of Justice Report on the Events at Waco, 1993
- “Why the Waco Siege Ended in Disaster” – Time, March 2018
- “Waco: The Rules of Engagement” – Oscar-nominated documentary, 1997
- U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Statements by Charles Grassley, 1995
- “The Waco Siege” – History Channel, digital archive
- “The Missing Front Door” – Dallas Morning News, 1995
- United Nations Convention on Chemical Weapons, 1993
- “The Branch Davidians Were Not All White” – Texas Monthly, April 2018
- “ATF Budget Justification and Congressional Testimony” – National Archives
- Impact of USDA Food Shipment and Funding Freeze Across the United States: A State-by-State Analysis
1. Executive Summary
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has recently implemented a freeze on food shipments and funding, a measure that is significantly affecting various food assistance programs across the nation, including The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA), and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program (LFS) 1. Reports indicate that approximately $1 billion in funds intended for these programs have been either canceled or frozen 1. This action follows an earlier freeze on federal funds, compounding the uncertainty for stakeholders 2. The current administration has characterized these changes as a necessary return to “long-term, fiscally responsible initiatives,” suggesting that the temporary measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic are no longer the agency’s priority 4.
The timing of this freeze, particularly during February and March, which are critical planning months for farmers, introduces considerable uncertainty into the agricultural sector 6. Farmers at this time of year typically make crucial decisions regarding what and how much to plant, often based on anticipated contracts and funding from programs such as LFPA and LFS. The abrupt nature of the freeze disrupts these carefully laid plans, potentially leading to wasted resources and significant financial losses for agricultural producers. This disruption can also have a cascading effect on the local food supply chain, as farmers may become hesitant to invest in production without the assurance of guaranteed markets for their goods 6.
Furthermore, the decision to freeze these funds appears to contradict previous announcements from the USDA regarding substantial investments in the very same programs 2. In December 2024, the USDA had announced a significant $1.13 billion investment aimed at bolstering local and regional food systems 2. The subsequent reversal of this commitment just a few months later has created a climate of instability and eroded trust in federal assurances. This inconsistency poses significant challenges for food banks, schools, and farmers, as it becomes exceedingly difficult for them to engage in effective long-term planning when federal support appears unreliable 2.
Preliminary findings from the available data suggest that numerous states are bracing for significant financial losses that will impact food banks, schools, and local farmers. The freeze is anticipated to curtail the ability of these organizations to provide fresh, locally sourced food to vulnerable populations, potentially affecting the nutritional intake of those most in need. Specific quantities of food, including essential items such as fresh produce, dairy products, and protein sources, are reported to be at risk of reduction or cancellation 6. The emphasis placed on local food sourcing through programs like LFPA and LFS, which were designed to foster the development of more resilient food systems, is now facing a considerable challenge due to this abrupt freeze in funding 7. These programs were intended to strengthen the connections between local agricultural economies and institutions serving vulnerable populations, thereby creating more equitable and robust food networks. The current freeze potentially reverses the progress achieved in these areas, raising concerns about the future resilience of the nation’s food supply chain.
2. State-by-State Impact Analysis
- Alabama:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: No specific monetary impact has been identified for Alabama within the provided materials. However, the state is mentioned in the broader context of the nationwide USDA funding freeze affecting farmers 13. The freeze is impacting programs that facilitate the purchase of food from local farms by schools and food banks 15. Alabama’s participation in programs subject to the $1 billion in cuts has also been noted 12.
- The agricultural landscape of Alabama is characterized by a significant presence of family-owned farms, which constitute a substantial majority of the state’s agricultural operations 14. These smaller farming entities often operate with narrower profit margins and are more reliant on federal grant programs to maintain financial stability and invest in sustainable agricultural practices. The current funding freeze introduces considerable uncertainty regarding reimbursements for past expenditures and the future of contracts, potentially placing a significant financial strain on these farms and hindering their long-term viability. This situation could have broader implications for Alabama’s overall agricultural economy, which generates over $9 billion in agricultural output annually 14.
- Alaska:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Alaska’s TEFAP program, which is federally funded, provides crucial emergency food assistance to low-income residents across the state 17. Additionally, Alaska is subject to the nationwide reductions in funding for the LFPA and LFS programs . However, the specific financial impact of these LFPA and LFS cuts on Alaska has not been detailed in the provided information.
- Given Alaska’s unique geographic challenges, including its remote location and the considerable logistical complexities associated with its food supply chain, the state may be particularly susceptible to disruptions in federal food assistance programs. The limited agricultural land in Alaska and the high costs of transporting food to many parts of the state result in a greater reliance on federal aid to ensure food security for its residents, especially those with low incomes. Therefore, any reductions or uncertainties in programs like TEFAP, LFPA, and LFS could have a more pronounced impact on food access and affordability in Alaska compared to many other states.
- Arizona:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Arizona has a federally funded TEFAP program that offers emergency food assistance to low-income individuals, including the elderly 19. The state is also affected by the $1 billion in cuts to the LFS and LFPA programs at the national level . However, specific financial repercussions of these cuts for Arizona have not been identified in the provided resources.
- Despite Arizona’s participation in both the TEFAP program and the nationally impacted LFPA and LFS programs, the lack of specific data detailing the financial losses within the state underscores a broader issue of transparency and data availability regarding the consequences of such federal funding freezes. Without clear and readily accessible information on the monetary value and the quantities of food affected in Arizona, it becomes challenging for state agencies, food banks, and advocacy organizations to accurately gauge the extent of the impact and to develop effective strategies for mitigation or to seek alternative sources of funding to address the potential shortfalls.
- Arkansas:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: The impact on Adam Chappell’s farm is uncertain, but his operation relies on programs administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 6.
- Impacted Organizations: Chappell Farms, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 6.
- Source Type: Nonprofit (National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition) 6.
- Source Link: https://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/farmers-speak-out-on-the-devastating-impact-of-usda-funding-freeze/
- The experience of Adam Chappell of Chappell Farms in Arkansas illustrates that the ramifications of the USDA funding freeze extend beyond direct food assistance programs. Chappell highlighted the significant staffing reductions at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), with over 40 employees reportedly lost in the state 6. His farm, an 8,000-acre operation, heavily depends on NRCS programs for conservation efforts and cost-saving practices. These staffing cuts threaten the agency’s capacity to process payments and secure new contracts, potentially hindering the adoption of sustainable farming practices and impacting the financial stability of farms like Chappell’s. This situation reveals a cascading effect of the USDA upheaval, affecting not only food aid but also crucial agricultural support services.
- California:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $60,000 (loss for Anna Knight’s farm in one week) 6.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: 1,000 food boxes per week (provided by Anna Knight’s farm through LFPA) 6.
- Impacted Organizations: Anna Knight’s farm 6.
- Source Type: Nonprofit (National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition) 6.
- Source Link: https://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/farmers-speak-out-on-the-devastating-impact-of-usda-funding-freeze/
- Notes: California is identified as one of the states receiving the highest levels of funding through the LFPA program .
- The substantial financial loss reported by Anna Knight, a farmer in California, underscores the significant reliance of local producers on the LFPA program. Knight’s farm, which provides 1,000 food boxes each week through LFPA, experienced a $60,000 loss in just a single week due to the funding freeze 6. This figure suggests the potential for a widespread and severe economic impact on California’s local agricultural sector, given that the state is among the highest recipients of LFPA funding nationwide. The disruption not only affects the immediate income of farmers but also jeopardizes their ability to plan for future production, especially considering that many had already invested in crops based on anticipated LFPA contracts.
- Colorado:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $13.1 million 21.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce 22.
- Impacted Organizations: Food Bank for Larimer County, Food Bank of the Rockies, School Nutrition Association of Colorado, schools and child care programs across the state 21.
- Source Type: Media (9News, Colorado.gov), Nonprofit (Feeding Colorado) .
- Source Link: https://www.9news.com/article/money/usda-program-cuts-impact-colorado-food-banks-schools/73-ff3fccf3-62da-45c0-8236-937bfeccca1a, https://www.colorado.gov/governor/news/governor-polis-usda-cuts-hurt-colorado-kids-farmers,((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBEkwU69ICw))
- Notes: Colorado was the first state in the nation to sign onto the LFPA program 24.
- Colorado is facing a significant loss of $13.1 million in federal funding due to the USDA’s decision to discontinue the Local Foods for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement (LFPA) programs 21. This substantial cut will directly affect the ability of Colorado food banks and schools to purchase fresh produce from local farmers. The Food Bank for Larimer County and the Food Bank of the Rockies, the state’s largest food bank, anticipate significant challenges in maintaining their current levels of fresh food distribution. The loss of nearly $2 million in LFPA funding for the Food Bank of the Rockies alone will impact the availability of fresh produce for Coloradans in need. Similarly, the School Nutrition Association of Colorado highlights that the LFS program helped integrate more local foods into school meal programs, and the funding cuts will lead to a reduction in these efforts, meaning less fresh produce on the plates of schoolchildren. Governor Polis has criticized the decision, emphasizing its negative impact on children, families, and Colorado farmers, while Feeding Colorado notes that the program provided a crucial market access point for small and midsize farms.
- Connecticut:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Over $9 million 25. Connecticut Foodshare anticipates losing around $1 million this year from LFPA alone 11.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce 11. Over one million meals were distributed through LFPA in the past two rounds 11.
- Impacted Organizations: Connecticut Foodshare, food pantries across Connecticut, schools, local farmers such as Lathrop Farm 11.
- Source Type: Media (Connecticut Public, NBC Connecticut) 11.
- Source Link: https://www.ctpublic.org/news/2025-03-14/ct-loses-millions-intended-for-local-food-purchasing-as-federal-funding-cuts-continue, https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/federal-funding-cut-to-decrease-fresh-produce-in-food-banks/3517982/
- Connecticut is facing a loss of over $9 million in funding from the USDA, which was intended to support the purchase of local food for schools and food banks 25. This includes $5.6 million for the Local Food for Schools program and $3.7 million for the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, funding that would have continued through 2027. Connecticut Foodshare expects to lose approximately $1 million in funding this year alone from the LFPA program, which has invested nearly $3 million in farmers over the past two rounds to distribute more than one million meals 11. The loss of this funding will likely lead to a decrease in the amount of fresh produce available at food banks, impacting the nutritional options for those in need. Connecticut Foodshare reports a 23% increase in the number of people relying on their services, making the federal cuts particularly detrimental 26. The state’s Human Services Committee has passed a bill proposing $10 million in state funding for food banks to purchase produce, with $1.5 million specifically for Connecticut farmers, indicating a proactive effort to mitigate the impact of the federal cuts 25.
- Delaware:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: The Food Bank of Delaware is experiencing challenges due to the USDA halting scheduled shipments of vital food aid through TEFAP 10. In February alone, over 50% of the food received by the food bank came from USDA 27. No specific financial impact for LFPA or LFS has been reported for Delaware in the provided information .
- The Food Bank of Delaware is heavily reliant on the USDA’s Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) for its supply of essential food items, including fresh produce, dairy, protein, and shelf-stable goods 10. The recent halt in scheduled shipments has created significant concerns for the food bank’s ability to meet the needs of food-insecure residents, as over half of their food supply in February came from this source 27. Without these critical resources, the food bank faces limited options to fill the gap, potentially leading to devastating consequences for Delaware’s most vulnerable populations. The food bank is actively working with local government partners and the Feeding America network to address this challenge, highlighting the urgency of the situation 27.
- Florida:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Estimated $42 million for LFS and $22.4 million for LFPA in 2025 28.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh fruits, vegetables, dairy products, proteins (intended through LFS) 28.
- Impacted Organizations: Florida school partners, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, food banks and organizations reaching underserved communities 28.
- Source Type: Media (Pensacola News Journal) 28.
- Source Link: https://news.yahoo.com/usda-cuts-1b-local-food-193657103.html
- Notes: Florida was expecting a combined total of $22,439,038 from LFPA programs in 2025 28. Florida is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Florida is anticipating a significant reduction in federal funding for local food purchasing programs, with an estimated loss of $42,583,882 from the Local Food for Schools (LFS) program and $22,439,038 from the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program in 2025 28. The LFS program aimed to provide Florida schools participating in the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program with locally sourced foods, including fresh fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and proteins, to enhance students’ nutritional intake and support local farmers 28. Similarly, the LFPA program focused on linking local and regional food sources with food banks and organizations serving underserved communities 28. The cancellation of this funding will likely impact the ability of Florida schools to offer a diverse range of healthy, local options and reduce the resources available to food banks for purchasing from local, regional, and underserved producers 28.
- Georgia:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Close to $35 million this year (according to Senator Ossoff’s office) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh, locally grown food .
- Impacted Organizations: 81 school nutrition programs, over 150 farmers and producers, food banks 31.
- Source Type: Media (WABE, YouTube) .
- Source Link: https://www.wabe.org/trump-administration-cuts-usda-fresh-food-funding-to-schools-and-food-banks-georgia-responds/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Oosp61-Ds
- Notes: Georgia relied on these programs for years 31. Georgia is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Georgia is facing a significant loss of approximately $35 million in federal funding this year due to the cancellation of the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program (LFS) and the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) . These programs have been instrumental in connecting local Georgia farmers with schools and food banks, ensuring that students and food-insecure individuals have access to fresh, locally grown food . In the first year of the LFS program, 81 school nutrition programs in Georgia participated, sourcing products from over 150 farmers and producers, with about 75% of the purchases coming from Georgia farmers 32. The termination of this funding will create uncertainty for these farmers, schools, and food banks, potentially limiting the availability of nutritious, local food options, especially given the reported rise in food insecurity in the state 32.
- Hawaii:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Hawaii’s TEFAP program received $1,871,334.97 in USDA-donated food in FFY 2024 . The state is also subject to the nationwide cuts in LFPA and LFS programs . No specific financial impact found for LFPA or LFS in Hawaii.
- Hawaii’s TEFAP program plays a vital role in supplementing the diets of low-income individuals and households by providing them with emergency food and nutrition assistance at no cost . In Federal Fiscal Year 2024, Hawaii received a substantial amount of USDA-donated food through this program . While the state is also subject to the nationwide funding freeze impacting LFPA and LFS programs, the specific financial repercussions for Hawaii have not been detailed in the provided information. Given Hawaii’s unique agricultural landscape and its reliance on both local production and imported goods, the impact of these broader cuts on the state’s food security and local food systems warrants further investigation.
- Idaho:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Idaho’s Department of Health and Welfare intended to utilize the LFPA grant to establish new partnerships with socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, aiming to provide seasonal, fresh commodities to the state’s network of food pantries and schools . The Idaho Foodbank distributes TEFAP commodities in eastern and parts of southwest Idaho . However, the specific financial impact of the USDA funding freeze on Idaho’s LFPA and LFS programs has not been reported in the provided materials .
- The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare had developed plans to leverage the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) grant to enhance its food distribution network, with a particular focus on partnering with socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers within Idaho and neighboring states . The goal was to supplement existing donated foods with fresh, seasonal commodities for distribution to food pantries, schools, and other organizations serving underserved communities . This initiative, which also aimed to strengthen Idaho’s food distribution network in low-income areas by collaborating with the Department of Agriculture and statewide food banks, now faces uncertainty due to the USDA funding freeze. The potential disruption of these plans could impact both the accessibility of fresh food for vulnerable populations and the market opportunities for local, socially disadvantaged producers.
- Illinois:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Illinois expected to receive $147 million under LFPA 12. The Northern Illinois Food Bank will have to absorb $165,000 in already spent funds 34.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Meat, fresh produce, nutritious donations (intended through LFPA) 12. 27% of the Northern Illinois Food Bank’s distributed food is fresh from local farmers, funded in part by the frozen money 34.
- Impacted Organizations: Illinois Department of Agriculture, Northern Illinois Food Bank, Illinois Stewardship Alliance, local farmers 12.
- Source Type: Media (CBS Chicago), News Article (DTN), Nonprofit (Illinois Stewardship Alliance) 12.
- Source Link: https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/17/cutting-local-food-programs-help, https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/chicago-area-food-bank-programs-usda-funding/, https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/
- Notes: Illinois is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Illinois is facing a potentially massive loss of $147 million in anticipated funding under the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program 12. This significant reduction will have a profound impact on both ends of the food chain in the state, affecting farmers who had planned for reimbursements and the food-insecure communities that rely on nutritious donations such as meat and fresh produce 12. The Northern Illinois Food Bank, which serves 570,000 people monthly across 13 counties, has been particularly impacted, having already been awarded $3.1 billion through the Illinois EATS program (funded in part by LFPA) and now facing the prospect of not being reimbursed for $165,000 already spent 34. This situation is especially concerning as the food bank reports an all-time high in demand for its services, with 27% of the distributed food being fresh produce sourced from local farmers through the very funding that is now frozen 35.
- Indiana:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Thomas Eich, who operates Kankakee Valley Homestead in Walkerton, Indiana, received notification that his contracts with both the LFS and LFPA programs have been cancelled . No statewide financial impact has been reported in the provided information .
- The cancellation of contracts for Thomas Eich of Kankakee Valley Homestead in Indiana with both the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) programs illustrates the direct and immediate impact of the USDA funding freeze on individual farmers . Eich, like many small-scale fruit and vegetable producers, relied on these programs for critical market access, opportunities that are often limited to farmers growing commodity crops. The termination of these contracts leaves farmers like Eich scrambling and raises concerns about the financial viability of their operations, as well as the broader implications for food security among vulnerable populations who benefited from the fresh produce supplied through these programs.
- Iowa:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Estimated $3.8 million worth of food for food banks and pantries from TEFAP cuts 37. $11.3 million in local food purchasing support for food banks, schools, and child care programs through LFPA and LFSCC over the next three years is cancelled 37. $7.8 million in spending impacted by LFPA and LFS cancellation .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Dozens of truckloads of meat, milk, cheese, and vegetables cancelled (TEFAP) 37. Vegetables, meat, eggs, turkey, beef (through LFPA and LFS) .
- Impacted Organizations: Iowa Farmers Union, National Farm to School Network, 300 farms, 135 Iowa school districts, 951 food distribution locations, Southeast Linn Community Center, Coralville Community Food Pantry, Food Bank of Siouxland .
- Source Type: Nonprofit (Iowa Farmers Union, Iowa Hunger Coalition), Media (Iowa Public Radio, WeAreIowa.com), News Article (DTN) .
- Source Link: https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/17/cutting-local-food-programs-help, https://iowafarmersunion.org/usda-cancels-local-food-funding-creating-uncertainty-for-iowa-farmers-and-food-hubs/, https://www.iowapublicradio.org/harvest-public-media/2025-03-13/usda-ends-programs-schools-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food, https://www.weareiowa.com/article/news/agriculture/usda-local-food-purchasing-assistance-local-food-for-schools-trump-administration-cuts-iowa-department-of-agriculture/524-332b7ce0-b99d-4499-b217-ed41548bbd29, https://www.iowahungercoalition.org/news/
- Iowa is facing a significant double blow from the USDA funding freeze, with cuts affecting both the TEFAP program and local food purchasing initiatives 37. The cancellation of additional TEFAP funding is estimated to result in a loss of $3.8 million worth of food for Iowa’s food banks and pantries, including the cancellation of dozens of truckloads of essential items like meat, milk, cheese, and vegetables 37. Furthermore, the termination of the Local Food Purchasing Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and the Local Foods for Schools and Child Care Cooperative Agreement Program (LFSCC) will eliminate $11.3 million in local food purchasing support over the next three years, impacting 300 farms, 135 school districts, and 951 food distribution locations . This decision has created considerable uncertainty for Iowa farmers who had planned over $3 million in food sales for 2025 through these programs and for food access sites that relied on them for fresh, nutritious food . The Iowa Farmers Union has expressed deep concern over the cancellation, highlighting the devastating impact on farmers and the disruption of a system that was just beginning to flourish 39.
- Kansas:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Kansas’s Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) provides free USDA commodity foods to low-income households across the state 40. Kansas is also subject to the nationwide cuts affecting the LFPA and LFS programs . However, specific financial details regarding the impact of the LFPA and LFS freeze on Kansas have not been identified in the provided resources.
- Kansas has an established TEFAP program that distributes USDA commodity foods to low-income residents through a network of participating providers 40. While the state is also affected by the nationwide cancellation of the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) and Local Food for Schools (LFS) programs, the available information does not specify the monetary value of the funding that Kansas was expected to receive or the extent to which food banks, schools, and local farmers in the state will be impacted by these cuts. Further research may be necessary to determine the specific consequences of the USDA funding freeze for Kansas.
- Kentucky:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: The Kentucky Department of Agriculture had plans to utilize the LFPA program to purchase local foods from socially disadvantaged and local producers throughout the Commonwealth for distribution to underserved populations . Kentucky is also subject to the nationwide cuts in the LFPA and LFS programs . However, the specific financial impact of the current funding freeze on Kentucky has not been reported in the provided information.
- The Kentucky Department of Agriculture had outlined an approach for administering the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program funds through three main projects, including a partnership with the Feeding KY network of food banks to purchase and distribute food, expansion of frozen meal preparation programs, and direct contracting for food boxes . This program was intended to purchase food from local Kentucky producers at fair market prices, thereby strengthening market channels for these producers and providing nutritious food to underserved populations. The USDA funding freeze now casts uncertainty over the implementation and scope of these planned initiatives in Kentucky.
- Louisiana:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Louisiana has a Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) that provides food assistance to low-income individuals and households experiencing food insufficiency . The Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry (LDAF) also participated in the LFPA program in previous years . However, the specific impact of the current USDA funding freeze on Louisiana’s LFPA and LFS programs has not been detailed in the provided materials .
- Louisiana operates a Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) to support individuals and families facing food insecurity . While the state has a history of participation in the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, the available information does not specify the extent to which Louisiana will be affected by the recent USDA funding freeze that has led to the cancellation of LFPA for 2025 and the Local Food for Schools (LFS) program. Further investigation may be needed to determine the potential impact on Louisiana’s food banks, schools, and local agricultural producers.
- Maine:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $1.25 million in LFPA funding over the next three years . TEFAP is expected to shrink by 50%-65% per month 42. The Good Shepherd Food Bank anticipates a reduction of approximately 250,000 pounds of food per month from TEFAP 44.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Projected loss of 500,000 to 600,000 pounds of fresh, local produce (LFPA) 44. Staple food products (TEFAP) 42.
- Impacted Organizations: Good Shepherd Food Bank, Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry (DACF), farmers, families facing food insecurity 44.
- Source Type: Nonprofit (Good Shepherd Food Bank, Maine Food Center), Media (Maine Beacon) .
- Source Link: https://www.prfoodcenter.org/post/cuts-in-federal-programs-impact-local-hunger-initiatives, https://www.gsfb.org/blog/2025/03/12/good-shepherd-food-bank-responds-to-federal-food-assistance-reductions/, https://mainebeacon.com/trump-administration-usda-cuts-willstrip-food-away-from-maine-families/
- Maine is bracing for significant reductions in federal food assistance, with the cancellation of the LFPA25 extension resulting in a projected loss of $1.25 million in funding over the next three years . This cut alone is expected to lead to a shortfall of 500,000 to 600,000 pounds of fresh, local produce that the Good Shepherd Food Bank would have distributed to families facing food insecurity 44. Additionally, the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), a long-standing federal program, is anticipated to shrink by 50%-65% per month, leading to an estimated reduction of 250,000 pounds of staple foods per month for the Good Shepherd Food Bank starting in April 2025 42. These cuts come at a time when food insecurity remains high in Maine, and grocery prices continue to strain household budgets, posing real challenges to the charitable food network’s ability to provide nutritious food across the state 45.
- Maryland:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: The Maryland Food Bank and the Capital Area Food Bank utilized funds from the LFPA program to purchase food directly from local Maryland producers, including farmers and watermen . Maryland’s TEFAP program is administered by the Department of Human Services (DHS), which contracts with both the Maryland Food Bank (MFB) and the Capital Area Food Bank (CAFB) to receive, store, and distribute USDA foods to eligible agencies throughout the state 46. While no specific financial impact of the current USDA funding freeze on Maryland’s LFPA and LFS programs has been identified in the provided materials , concerns have been raised regarding the loss of LFPA as an important economic stimulus for local agricultural producers .
- The Maryland Food Bank has highlighted the importance of the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program not only for providing nutritious food to those in need but also as a vital economic stimulus for local Maryland producers, including farmers and watermen . The program facilitated the purchase of locally grown and harvested products, supporting these businesses and ensuring a supply of fresh food for food banks. The recent cancellation of LFPA raises concerns about the future of these relationships and the potential economic impact on Maryland’s agricultural community, even if the specific financial figures are not yet available. The Maryland Food Bank is urging residents to contact their elected officials to advocate for the reinstatement of this program .
- Massachusetts:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Over $18 million in subsidies from LFS and LFPA . $12 million intended for local school districts (LFS) 27. Bardwell Farm estimates over $200,000 in lost revenue .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh food to schools (LFS) .
- Impacted Organizations: Massachusetts farmers (over 7,000 farms), school districts, food banks .
- Source Type: Media (Commonwealth Beacon, Gettysburg Connection), News Article (Farmonaut) .
- Source Link: https://commonwealthbeacon.org/government/cut-hay-not-usda-mass-farmers-rally-in-hadley-against-agriculture-program-cuts/, https://gettysburgconnection.org/usda-cancels-1-billion-in-local-food-funding-for-schools-and-food-banks/, https://farmonaut.com/usa/massachusetts-farmers-face-uncertainty-federal-funding-freeze-and-usda-program-cuts-impact-local-agriculture/, https://farmonaut.com/usa/massachusetts-farmers-face-uncertainty-federal-funding-freeze-impacts-local-agriculture-and-food-security/
- Massachusetts is facing a substantial loss of over $18 million in subsidies due to cuts to the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) programs . This includes $12 million specifically intended for local school districts to purchase fresh food from local farmers 27. The impact is being felt directly by farmers, with one farm, Bardwell Farm in Hatfield, estimating over $200,000 in lost revenue this year alone due to these program cuts . The cancellation of these programs, which have been described as a “game-changer” for connecting local producers and consumers, raises serious concerns about food security and the resilience of the local food system in Massachusetts, which is home to over 7,000 farms 12. The suspension of the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement not only threatens food security but also jeopardizes the integrity of the state’s local food system, potentially affecting 20% of Massachusetts’ food-insecure population 16.
- Michigan:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: About $1.7 million in Michigan invoices have been held up 49. The state normally receives approximately $16 million per year through LFPA 49. Food banks across the state are expected to lose $6.6 million in LFPA funds .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Locally-sourced meat and produce 49. Ohio’s LFPA funds provided 4 million meals last year, suggesting a potentially similar impact in Michigan .
- Impacted Organizations: Michigan food banks (Food Bank Council of Michigan, Kalamazoo Loaves and Fishes, Eastern Market in Detroit), Flint Fresh Food Hub, about 500 Michigan farmers, Michigan Department of Education .
- Source Type: Media (Bridge Michigan, Michigan Farm News), News Article (DTN) .
- Source Link: https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/michigan-food-banks-hit-trump-funding-freeze-local-farmers, https://www.michiganfarmnews.com/source-usda-cuts-to-affect-local-food-banks-nonprofits-small-farmers, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/17/cutting-local-food-programs-help, https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/ohio-food-pantries-brace-for-federal-funding-cuts/530-5e9d0638-c140-441a-a153-7a3aa170ea54
- Notes: Michigan is among the states with the highest LFPA funding and the largest number of participating farmers .
- Michigan’s food banks are facing immediate challenges due to the USDA funding freeze, with approximately $1.7 million in invoices currently being held up 49. The state typically receives about $16 million annually through the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, and food banks across Michigan are anticipating a loss of $6.6 million in LFPA funds . This funding is crucial for purchasing locally-sourced meat and produce, and the freeze has already prompted the Food Bank Council of Michigan to advise its regional food banks to temporarily halt LFPA program purchases due to concerns about reimbursement . The disruption could become a crisis for Michigan’s over 2,800 hunger relief agencies if it continues into the spring, as organizations like the Flint Fresh Food Hub need to sign contracts with local farmers for produce 50. About 500 Michigan farmers participate in the program, and the uncertainty surrounding funding could significantly impact their livelihoods and the availability of local food for those in need 50. Eastern Market in Detroit also anticipates a major impact on its free food program if the funding is not released within the next four to six weeks 50.
- Minnesota:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Food shelves across Minnesota rely on the TEFAP program for approximately 20% of their food supply, including essential items like milk, eggs, meat, and chicken 18. The state is also subject to the nationwide cuts in the LFPA and LFS programs . However, specific financial details regarding the impact of the LFPA and LFS freeze on Minnesota have not been reported in the provided information.
- Minnesota’s network of food shelves depends on the TEFAP program for a significant portion of the food they distribute to individuals and families facing food insecurity 18. The potential loss of funding for this program is a major concern, as it provides crucial sources of protein and dairy 51. While Minnesota is also affected by the nationwide freeze on LFPA and LFS funding, the lack of specific financial impact data for these programs within the state makes it difficult to fully assess the overall consequences for local food systems and food security.
- Mississippi:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Mississippi has received more than $6.8 million from the LFPA program since its inception .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Locally grown produce, seafood, and meat (through LFPA) .
- Impacted Organizations: Mississippi food banks .
- Source Type: Media (YouTube) .
- Source Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a29KqrjOO-g
- Notes: Mississippi’s TEFAP program is administered by the Department of Human Services (MDHS) 52.
- Mississippi has benefited from the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, receiving over $6.8 million in funding which has supported the purchase of locally grown produce, seafood, and meat for underserved communities . While the immediate impact of the funding freeze on existing programs for the current growing season may be manageable, the cancellation of future LFPA funding will likely affect the ability of Mississippi food banks to continue sourcing local foods . This could have implications for both the nutritional quality of food available to those in need and the economic opportunities for local farmers and producers who have participated in the program. Discussions are reportedly underway to explore alternative programs for the future, focusing on expanding access to produce .
- Missouri:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Missouri could lose between $12 and $25 million (estimate from Chris Bernard of Hunger Free America) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Meat, eggs, and produce (intended through LFPA and LFS) 48.
- Impacted Organizations: Food banks, schools, local farmers .
- Source Type: Media (Iowa Public Radio, KCUR, IPM Newsroom, News On 6) .
- Source Link: https://www.iowapublicradio.org/harvest-public-media/2025-03-13/usda-ends-programs-schools-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food, https://www.kcur.org/news/2025-03-13/usda-ends-programs-schools-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food, https://ipmnewsroom.org/usda-ends-programs-that-help-schools-and-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food/, http://www.newson6.com/story/67ddf82f13d6d749f699e1a6/oklahoma-food-banks-brace-for-impact-of-usda-funding-cuts
- Notes: Missouri is subject to the nationwide cuts in LFPA and LFS programs .
- Missouri is projected to experience a significant loss of between $12 and $25 million due to the USDA’s cancellation of the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) programs . These programs were designed to help schools and food banks purchase locally grown food, including meat, eggs, and produce, from local farmers 48. The termination of this funding is expected to have a considerable impact on the ability of these institutions to provide fresh, nutritious food to the communities they serve. Chris Bernard, CEO of Hunger Free America, estimates this substantial loss, which will primarily affect local food systems and farmers in Missouri . The programs were initially established during the COVID-19 pandemic to build a more resilient food system and support local food options, and their cancellation is anticipated to cause a retraction of the vital infrastructure that had developed to connect food banks, schools, and local producers .
- Montana:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Montana’s Department of Agriculture received funding for the LFPA program to strengthen supply chains and foster equitable and resilient local food systems across the state 47. Several projects were awarded grants through LFPA, supporting local producers and food banks serving communities on reservations and in rural areas 47. Montana is also subject to the nationwide cuts in the LFPA and LFS programs .
- Montana’s Department of Agriculture utilized the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program to achieve the goals of strengthening food supply chains and promoting equitable and resilient local food systems throughout the state 47. Through this program, grants were awarded to various organizations, including the Day Eagle Hope Project on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, the North Valley Food Bank in collaboration with FAST Blackfeet and Land to Hand MT, People’s Partner for Community Development on the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, and Helping Hands in Hardin, among others 47. These projects focused on procuring locally produced foods such as beef, oats, bison, eggs, fruits, and vegetables to serve vulnerable populations in both on-reservation and off-reservation communities 47. The USDA’s nationwide funding freeze on LFPA and LFS programs now casts uncertainty over the continuation and expansion of these vital initiatives in Montana, potentially impacting the progress made in supporting local food economies and ensuring food access for underserved populations.
- Nebraska:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $400,000 (cancellation of RFSI grant for Steve Tucker) 6.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Small-scale, specialized food products (intended for processing facility) 6.
- Impacted Organizations: Steve Tucker (Southwest Nebraska) 6.
- Source Type: Nonprofit (National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition) 6.
- Source Link: https://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/farmers-speak-out-on-the-devastating-impact-of-usda-funding-freeze/
- Steve Tucker from Southwest Nebraska faced the cancellation of a $400,000 Resilient Food Systems Infrastructure (RFSI) grant, a program designed to build resilience in the middle of the food supply chain and provide better markets to small farms 6. This grant was intended to help establish a much-needed processing facility for small-scale, specialized food products in the region. The federal funding freeze led to the delay and eventual cancellation of this grant, derailing Tucker’s plans and halting progress on a project that had the potential to significantly support local farmers and businesses. Tucker explained that without the grant, the project is no longer viable, representing a loss of potential jobs and opportunities for small producers and a negative ripple effect on the local economy. While not directly related to immediate food aid distribution, this cancellation highlights how the USDA funding freeze impacts critical infrastructure projects aimed at strengthening local food systems.
- Nevada:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Approximately $8 million ($4.1 million for LFS and $3.9 million for LFPA) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce (intended through LFPA and LFS) 2.
- Impacted Organizations: Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA), 63 school food authorities, Three Square Food Bank, Food Bank of Northern Nevada, local farms and producers (like Blue Lizard Farms), Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, Walker River Paiute Tribe .
- Source Type: Media (The Nevada Independent, YouTube) .
- Source Link: https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/trump-administration-cancels-8m-for-nevada-schools-food-banks-to-buy-from-local-farms, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9LD3oeP6o
- Nevada is facing a loss of approximately $8 million in federal funding due to the cancellation of the Local Food Assistance Purchase Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program (LFS) . The Nevada Department of Agriculture (NDA) was set to receive about $4.1 million for LFS, intended for the state’s 63 school food authorities, and $3.9 million for LFPA for fiscal year 2025 . The NDA’s Home Feeds Nevada program, which utilizes LFPA funds, has been temporarily suspended, significantly impacting its ability to function . This funding cut will also affect food banks such as Three Square Food Bank in Las Vegas and the Food Bank of Northern Nevada in Sparks, which receive food through the Home Feeds Nevada program, with Three Square anticipating a “serious impact” on Nevadans who rely on their services . Local farms and producers, including those participating in programs like Home Feeds Nevada, which provided market certainty, may face downsizing 8. Additionally, the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe and the Walker River Paiute Tribe, which received LFPA funding in 2022, would likely have been impacted by the cancellation of future funding 8.
- New Hampshire:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Nearly $1 million (awarded through LFPA, intended to last through 2028) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce, protein, and dairy products (through NH Feeding NH program) .
- Impacted Organizations: New Hampshire Food Bank, NH Feeding NH program, over 400 partner agencies (food pantries, soup kitchens, schools, etc.), 250 local producers .
- Source Type: Media (Nashua Ink Link) .
- Source Link: https://nashua.inklink.news/nh-food-bank-losing-usda-funding-as-pandemic-era-food-programs-supporting-local-farmers-cut/
- Notes: New Hampshire’s TEFAP is a federally funded program 56.
- The New Hampshire Food Bank is facing a loss of nearly $1 million in USDA funding due to the termination of two pandemic-era programs, the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and the Local Food for Schools program . This funding, which was awarded to New Hampshire Feeding New Hampshire, a program operated by the New Hampshire Food Bank, was intended to last through 2028 and support the purchase of fresh produce, protein, and dairy products from 250 local producers for distribution through a network of over 400 partner agencies, including food pantries, schools, and senior centers . The loss of this funding will affect the Food Bank’s ability to provide these nutritious items to those in need and will also impact the local farmers who relied on this program as a market for their goods . Additionally, the New Hampshire Food Bank has learned that food purchased from a Canadian vendor will now be subject to tariffs, further increasing costs .
- New Jersey:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Over $26 million in funding for schools and food banks 58.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh food (broccoli, tomatoes, beef, pork, chicken) 58. Healthy foods 58.
- Impacted Organizations: New Jersey schools, food banks (including MEND in Orange), local New Jersey farmers and producers, School Nutrition Association of New Jersey, Northeast Farming Association of New Jersey 58.
- Source Type: Media (NJ Spotlight News, YouTube) 58.
- Source Link: https://www.thirteen.org/programs/nj-spotlight-news/usda-cuts-1741982962/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-udNH9cW-E
- New Jersey is facing a significant cut in federal funding, with over $26 million being eliminated from two USDA programs that helped schools and food banks purchase food directly from local farms and producers 58. The termination of the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement is expected to have a devastating impact on children, families, and farmers in the state 58. These programs funded the purchase of fresh foods such as broccoli, tomatoes, beef, pork, and chicken from local New Jersey farmers for school cafeterias and food pantries 58. School food service directors and the Northeast Farming Association of New Jersey have emphasized the crucial role these programs played in providing healthy food options and supporting the local agricultural industry, including beginning farmers 59. One food pantry in Orange, MEND (Meeting Essential Needs with Dignity), used LFPA funding to expand its home meal delivery program, bringing healthy foods to 220 families in Essex County who have difficulty accessing food pantries. The loss of this funding threatens the continuation of such vital services 59.
- New Mexico:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $2.8 million (LFPA extension for New Mexico) . $7.5 million funding shortfall across several programs (Specialty Crop Block Grant, Resilient Food Systems Infrastructure, and Local Food Purchase Assistance) 61.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Healthy and culturally appropriate food, locally produced beef, fresh produce . 899,402 pounds of locally grown food have been distributed since January 2023 through RF2FB .
- Impacted Organizations: The Food Depot, New Mexico Farmers’ Marketing Association, local food producers, farmers, ranchers, food banks (including those serving Las Cruces and Doña Ana County), Nourish New Mexico .
- Source Type: Media (Los Alamos Reporter, Organ Mountain News), Nonprofit (Rocky Mountain Farmers Union) .
- Source Link: https://losalamosreporter.com/2025/03/21/usda-federal-funding-cuts-terminate-successful-program-connecting-local-nm-food-producers-and-food-banks/, https://rmfu.org/federal-funding-freeze-puts-new-mexico-farmers-and-ranchers-at-risk/, https://www.organmountainnews.com/usda-ends-1b-in-local-food-programs-for-schools-food-banks/
- New Mexico is facing significant federal funding cuts that will terminate the successful Regional Farm to Food Bank (RF2FB) program, despite an initial extension . This program, funded through the USDA’s Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) Cooperative Agreement, has spent over $3.6 million with local producers on healthy and culturally appropriate food in the last three years, distributing 899,402 pounds of locally grown food since January 2023 and providing 749,502 healthy meals . The USDA’s decision to terminate the 2025 LFPA Cooperative Agreement means that the $2.8 million extension previously announced for New Mexico will no longer be available, halting the RF2FB program when current funding ends . This loss of federal support will profoundly impact local farmers, ranchers, food banks (including The Food Depot), and families who depend on this critical program, especially given that 94% of RF2FB purchases in 2024 were from socially disadvantaged and historically underserved producers . Additionally, New Mexico faces a $7.5 million funding shortfall across other essential programs like the Specialty Crop Block Grant and Resilient Food Systems Infrastructure, further jeopardizing infrastructure improvements and food distribution to food-insecure New Mexicans 61.
- New York:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: New York is identified as being among the states with the highest levels of funding through the LFPA program . However, specific financial details regarding the impact of the USDA funding freeze on New York’s LFPA and LFS programs have not been reported in the provided information.
- Given that New York is among the states receiving the highest allocations of funding through the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, the nationwide freeze on this and the Local Food for Schools (LFS) program is likely to have a substantial impact on the state’s food banks, schools, and local farmers. While the provided materials do not offer specific financial figures for New York’s expected losses, the high level of prior funding suggests a significant reliance on these programs for supporting local food systems and addressing food insecurity. The termination of these programs will likely necessitate adjustments in food procurement strategies and could negatively affect the economic stability of local agricultural producers who have participated in LFPA and LFS.
- North Carolina:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Approximately $3 million allocated to North Carolina food banks was temporarily frozen, but the program has since been terminated 23.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce (through LFPA) 23.
- Impacted Organizations: Second Harvest Food Bank, local farmers 23.
- Source Type: Media (WFMY News 2) 23.
- Source Link: https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/investigations/food-federal-funding-cuts-threaten-north-carolina-food-banks-ability-to-serve-communities/83-929536f3-83fd-4664-86d1-487bc3f687ca
- Notes: North Carolina had the largest number of farmers participating in the LFPA program .
- Food banks in North Carolina, including Second Harvest, are facing significant challenges due to the termination of the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program 23. Approximately $3 million in funding allocated to North Carolina food banks through LFPA was temporarily frozen before being unfrozen; however, the program itself has been discontinued 23. This cut is particularly impactful in North Carolina, which had the largest number of farmers participating in the LFPA program nationwide . The LFPA program enabled organizations like Second Harvest to purchase fresh produce from local farmers, ensuring nutritious options for those in need 23. The abrupt termination of the program forces food banks to reassess their strategies for meeting the growing demand for food assistance and finding alternative ways to source fresh produce for their communities 62.
- North Dakota:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $1.8 million for schools and $870,000 for child care facilities (LFSCC) 54.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Locally produced food for schools and childcare 54.
- Impacted Organizations: Schools, childcare facilities 54.
- Source Type: Media (KFGO) 54.
- Source Link: https://kfgo.com/2025/03/25/usda-upheaval-brings-uncertainty-to-farmers-rural-communities/
- Notes: Three USDA programs were terminated in North Dakota, including LFPA and LFSCC .
- North Dakota is experiencing the termination of several USDA programs, including the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program and the Local Food for Schools and Child Care (LFSCC) program, which will result in a loss of $1.8 million for schools and around $870,000 for purchases for childcare facilities 54. These programs aimed to help cover the costs of locally produced food for these institutions 54. The cancellation of these funds will likely impact the ability of schools and childcare centers in North Dakota to source and serve locally grown food, potentially affecting the nutritional quality of meals provided to students and children across the state 54. The termination of these programs adds to the uncertainty faced by farmers and rural communities in North Dakota due to broader USDA upheavals, including funding freezes in other agricultural support programs 63.
- Ohio:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Food banks across the state are expected to lose $6.6 million in LFPA funds . The Mid-Ohio Food Collective has lost over $1.5 million in the past two years and will lose an additional $1.3 million this year, totaling almost $3 million lost in LFPA funding .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: 4.6 million pounds of food were produced last fiscal year through LFPA in Ohio 64.
- Impacted Organizations: Ohio food banks (Ohio Association of Foodbanks, Mid-Ohio Food Collective, GRIN), local farmers .
- Source Type: Media (10TV, Dayton Daily News, KZYX) .
- Source Link: https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/ohio-food-pantries-brace-for-federal-funding-cuts/530-5e9d0638-c140-441a-a153-7a3aa170ea54,((https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/usda-program-cut-impacts-local-food-banks-local-farmers/VMZWRGNB5ZBG7JI4DWVJVKHLJA/)), https://www.kzyx.org/national-news/2025-03-22/how-ohios-food-banks-are-dealing-with-extensive-cuts-from-the-usda
- Notes: Ohio is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Ohio’s food banks are facing a significant reduction in federal funding, with an expected loss of $6.6 million in Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) funds statewide . The Mid-Ohio Food Collective alone anticipates a total loss of nearly $3 million in LFPA funding over three years, including $1.3 million this year . This program was responsible for bringing 4.6 million pounds of food to Ohio’s food banks in the last fiscal year 64. The cancellation of LFPA will impact the ability of food banks to provide locally grown food to their communities, potentially straining their resources at a time when demand for food assistance is high . This situation is further compounded by plans in the Ohio General Assembly to cut $7.5 million from the Ohio Food Program, which constitutes about 20% of the food distributed by food banks statewide . The Ohio Association of Foodbanks has noted that these cuts come at a tough time for social service organizations, which are also dealing with higher food prices .
- Oklahoma:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Oklahoma is projected to lose an estimated $25 million from USDA cuts already announced (estimate from Chris Bernard of Hunger Free America) . The Choctaw Nation lost a $1.7 million grant, the Cherokee Nation lost a $3.5 million grant, and the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes lost $300,000 .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Meat, eggs, and produce (intended through LFPA and LFS) .
- Impacted Organizations: Oklahoma food banks, schools, tribal nations (Choctaw Nation, Cherokee Nation, Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes), local farmers .
- Source Type: Media (News On 6, KOSU, Iowa Public Radio) .
- Source Link: http://www.newson6.com/story/67ddf82f13d6d749f699e1a6/oklahoma-food-banks-brace-for-impact-of-usda-funding-cuts, https://www.kosu.org/local-news/2025-03-11/usda-cancels-two-local-food-programs-for-schools-food-banks-and-tribal-nations-in-oklahoma, https://www.iowapublicradio.org/harvest-public-media/2025-03-13/usda-ends-programs-schools-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food
- Oklahoma is facing an estimated loss of $25 million in federal funding due to USDA cuts, which will significantly impact food banks, schools, and tribal nations across the state . These cuts target programs like the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) programs, which help these entities buy fresh foods from local farmers . Several tribal nations in Oklahoma have already been notified of grant cancellations, including the Choctaw Nation (losing $1.7 million), the Cherokee Nation (losing $3.5 million), and the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes (losing $300,000) . These funds were intended to support various feeding programs and the purchase of meat and fresh produce from local farmers . Oklahoma food banks have seen a 20% increase in requests for assistance in the last two years, making these funding reductions particularly concerning as they come at a time of growing need 61.
- Oregon:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Schools and food banks in Oregon relied on the LFS and LFPA programs to source food from nearby farms 53. No specific financial impact for Oregon has been reported in the provided materials .
- Schools and food banks in Oregon have utilized funding from the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) programs to procure fresh, locally produced food from nearby farms, supporting both the agricultural sector and providing nutritious meals to students and underserved individuals 53. The recent decision by the USDA to terminate these programs, withdrawing over $1 billion in funding nationally, will likely have a pronounced impact in Oregon, which has a strong network of small farms supplying fresh produce to schools 66. The sudden loss of these funding streams could disrupt this vital supply chain, leaving both educational institutions and charitable food organizations struggling to adjust and potentially questioning the future of local food sourcing in the state 66.
- Pennsylvania:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $13 million (LFPA contract cancellation) . The Central Pennsylvania Food Bank alone is expected to lose $120,000 per month 67.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Fresh produce (intended for food banks through LFPA) 67. Loss of 500,000 fewer meals per month for the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank 67.
- Impacted Organizations: 189 Pennsylvania farms, 14 food banks across the Commonwealth (including Central Pennsylvania Food Bank) 67.
- Source Type: Official (Pennsylvania Governor’s Office) .
- Source Link: https://www.pa.gov/governor/newsroom/2025-press-releases/gov-shapiro-stands-up-pa-farmers-appeals-usda-s-unlawful-decisio.html
- Notes: Pennsylvania is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Pennsylvania is facing a significant financial blow due to the USDA’s abrupt and unlawful cancellation of its agreement under the Local Food Purchasing Assistance (LFPA) Program, which was set to provide $13 million in federal funding over the next three years to support 189 Pennsylvania farms . This funding was intended to enable these farms to supply local food banks with fresh produce 67. The cancellation will also severely impact 14 food banks across the Commonwealth, including the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank, which alone anticipates losing $120,000 per month, equating to 500,000 fewer meals provided to hungry Pennsylvanians each month 67. Governor Shapiro has announced his administration is appealing the USDA’s decision, emphasizing that this action will cause Pennsylvania farms to lose a critical source of revenue and food banks to lose access to local, fresh food, ultimately hurting hungry families, children, military veterans, and seniors .
- Rhode Island:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $600,000 reduction to Southside Community Land Trust’s annual budget due to federal funding freezes and contract cancellations (not specified as solely USDA) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Food grown on Southside Community Land Trust farms .
- Impacted Organizations: Southside Community Land Trust, 16 community food access partners .
- Source Type: Nonprofit (Southside Community Land Trust) .
- Source Link: https://www.southsideclt.org/federal-funding-freeze-threatens-vital-community-food-farmer-programs/
- Notes: Rhode Island is subject to the nationwide cuts in LFPA and LFS programs .
- Southside Community Land Trust (SCLT) in Rhode Island is facing a significant financial challenge due to federal funding freezes and contract cancellations, resulting in a $600,000 reduction to its annual budget . While the specific amount attributable to the USDA freeze on LFPA and LFS programs is not detailed, this overall reduction threatens the foundation of SCLT’s work in Rhode Island’s most vulnerable communities at a time of rising food insecurity . Last year, 25,000 people consumed food grown on SCLT farms through their network of 16 community food access partners . The funding cuts jeopardize SCLT’s capacity to maintain its current level of support, potentially impacting programs that promote food sovereignty and economic opportunity in historically underserved communities .
- South Carolina:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $6.1 million (allocated towards South Carolina’s LFPA program) .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Local produce (intended through LFPA) .
- Impacted Organizations: South Carolina farmers (at least 120, including 60 underserved and rural farmers), schools, students .
- Source Type: Media (Spectrum Local News) .
- Source Link: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/sc/south-carolina/news/2025/03/14/food-aid-program-canceled
- Notes: South Carolina entered into an agreement with the USDA for LFPA in July 2022 .
- South Carolina is set to lose $6.1 million in federal funding that was originally allocated towards the state’s Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) . South Carolina entered into an agreement with the USDA for this program in July 2022, with the aim of working with a network of distributors and farmers to purchase food from at least 120 farmers, including at least 60 underserved and rural farmers and ranchers, and distribute the food to at least 24 counties in need . The cancellation of this COVID-era food aid program is raising concerns among state leaders about the impact on South Carolina students, particularly their access to fresh, local produce . USDA officials have stated that these programs are no longer aligned with the agency’s priorities .
- South Dakota:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: South Dakota utilizes USDA foods from the TEFAP program in its soup kitchens and food banks 20. The state is also subject to the nationwide cuts in the LFPA and LFS programs . No specific financial impact has been reported for LFPA or LFS in South Dakota within the provided materials.
- South Dakota participates in the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), which helps to distribute USDA-donated foods to food banks and soup kitchens across the state to supplement the diets of low-income individuals 20. While South Dakota is also affected by the nationwide funding freeze on the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) and Local Food for Schools (LFS) programs, the available information does not provide specific details regarding the financial impact of these cuts on the state. Further research may be necessary to determine the extent to which South Dakota’s food banks, schools, and local agricultural producers will be affected by these federal actions.
- Tennessee:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $12.6 million from the Local Food for Schools program and another $7.6 million through the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Local food for students (intended through LFS) .
- Impacted Organizations: Schools, childcare facilities, food banks, local groups .
- Source Type: Media (wbir.com) .
- Source Link: https://www.wbir.com/article/news/local/tennessee-lose-12m-funding-bring-local-food-students-across-the-state/51-4f9b175b-ad2b-41db-9367-2fc90898eee4
- Notes: Tennessee’s TEFAP program helps supplement the diets of low-income Americans .
- Tennessee is facing a significant loss of $12.6 million from the Local Food for Schools program and an additional $7.6 million from the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement, totaling over $20 million in cuts . These programs provided funds for schools and childcare facilities to purchase food from local farmers and for food banks and other local groups to support their food assistance efforts . The USDA’s decision to cut this funding will impact the ability of schools and childcare facilities in Tennessee to provide locally sourced food to students, and it will also reduce the resources available to food banks and other organizations working to combat food insecurity across the state . The School Nutrition Association has expressed concern that these cuts could impact around 12 million students nationwide, highlighting the potential scale of the problem in Tennessee as well .
- Texas:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: More than $72 million was awarded to the Texas Department of Agriculture this fiscal year for LFPA and LFPA Plus . The Tarrant Area Food Bank announced a $4.2 million loss in federal funds .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Meat and poultry (38%), produce (32%), bread and grains (11%) (through LFPA) . Equivalent to 2.5 million meals lost for the Tarrant Area Food Bank .
- Impacted Organizations: Texas Department of Agriculture, Tarrant Area Food Bank, 200 producers in Texas, over 20 local farmers partnering with Tarrant Area Food Bank (including Damas Farms) .
- Source Type: Media (NBC DFW, YouTube), Nonprofit (Feeding Texas) .
- Source Link: https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/small-farmers-economic-uncertainty-usda-funding-freezes/3799688/,((https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DPCB1W28ZhUU)), https://www.feedingtexas.org/news/breaking-usda-announces-1-billion-in-new-investments-in-hunger-relief-and-support-for-local-food-systems/
- Notes: Texas has the second-highest rate of food insecurity in the U.S.. Texas is among the states with the highest LFPA funding .
- Texas, which has the second-highest rate of food insecurity in the nation, is facing a significant impact from the USDA funding freeze . While the Texas Department of Agriculture was awarded over $72 million this fiscal year to support programs that purchase from local or underserved farmers through LFPA and LFPA Plus, the actual distribution of these funds has been affected . The Tarrant Area Food Bank has announced a $4.2 million loss in federal funds due to the cancellation of state agreements for the 2025 LFPA program and Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) food purchases, which is equivalent to a loss of 2.5 million meals for the remainder of their fiscal year . This cut has impacted their support to more than 20 local farmers, including Damas Farms, which had secured a significant contract with the food bank . The uncertainty surrounding federal funding is causing economic hardship for small and medium-scale farmers who must now readjust their budgets and look for alternative markets .
- Utah:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Utah’s TEFAP program provides food assistance to underprivileged Americans through the distribution of USDA commodities . The state is also subject to the nationwide cuts in the LFPA and LFS programs . No specific financial impact has been reported for LFPA or LFS in Utah within the provided materials .
- Utah’s TEFAP program plays a crucial role in providing food assistance to individuals and families with limited income through the distribution of commodities supplied by the USDA . While Utah is also affected by the nationwide termination of the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) and Local Food for Schools (LFS) programs, the available information does not specify the financial impact of these cuts on the state. Further research may be needed to determine the extent to which Utah’s food banks, schools, and local agricultural producers will be affected by these federal actions.
- Vermont:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Over $1.2 million (LFSCC program) ($944,000 for schools and $277,000 for early childhood programs) . Estimated $500k in LFPA grants and $333k in LFS for 2025 potentially impacted .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Local meats and vegetables (through LFSCC) .
- Impacted Organizations: Vermont schools, childcare centers, local farmers (Vermont Farm to School and Early Childhood Network) .
- Source Type: News Article (Citizen Portal), Reddit .
- Source Link:(https://citizenportal.ai/articles/2722344/Vermont/Vermont-advocates-rally-against-USDAs-termination-of-local-food-program-funding), https://www.reddit.com/r/vermont/comments/1j6qofj/suspension_of_usda_local_food_purchase_assistance/
- Notes: Vermont’s TEFAP program helps individuals and families with limited income get free food 69.
- Vermont is facing a significant setback with the abrupt termination of the Local Food for Schools and Child Care (LFSCC) program by the USDA, which was set to distribute over $1.2 million in funding ($944,000 for schools and $277,000 for early childhood programs) . This decision threatens vital connections between local farmers, schools, and childcare centers, jeopardizing food access for children and the economic stability of Vermont’s agricultural community . The LFSCC program had already demonstrated a powerful multiplier effect in its first round, significantly boosting sales for local farms and processors . The cancellation of this funding comes at a time when Vermont’s food system is already under strain, and local farmers have expressed deep concern over the loss of this financial support, with many reporting dramatic increases in sales to schools due to previous funding . Additionally, it is estimated that Vermont could also see an impact on approximately $500,000 in LFPA grants and $333,000 in LFS funding that were anticipated for 2025 .
- Virginia:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $13.5 million from LFS in past years 70. Budgeted $7.6 million for LFPA in FY 2025 70. The Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia expects a $300,000 cut in their budget (LFPA) 70.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Meat and produce (through LFPA and LFS) 70. Equivalent to 6,000 fewer servings of produce and 2,500 fewer servings of protein per month for the Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia 70.
- Impacted Organizations: Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia and the Eastern Shore, Virginia Department of Education, local farmers (166 in the past), schools .
- Source Type: Media (Suffolk News Herald), Nonprofit (Coastal Conservation League) .
- Source Link: https://www.suffolknewsherald.com/2025/03/18/foodbank-of-southeastern-virginia-hit-by-usda-funding-cuts/
- Notes: Virginia has a Farm to School program 70.
- Virginia is facing significant cuts to federal food programs, including an estimated loss of $13.5 million from the Local Food for Schools (LFS) program based on past funding 70. For fiscal year 2025, the state had budgeted $7.6 million for the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program 70. The Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia and the Eastern Shore anticipates a $300,000 reduction in its budget due to the end of the LFPA program, which is equivalent to 6,000 fewer servings of produce and 2,500 fewer servings of protein per month for the food bank 70. In the past, Virginia’s LFS program awarded $13.5 million, and the Virginia Department of Education has its own buy-local incentive program called Farm to School 70. The end of these federal programs will likely impact the ability of schools to purchase local food and reduce the resources available to food banks for sourcing meat and produce for food-insecure individuals in the state 70.
- Washington:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Over $11 million in funding for LFPA was distributed (though future funding is uncertain) 72.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Locally and regionally grown foods 72.
- Impacted Organizations: 31 hunger relief organizations and tribes, 255 unique regional and local farms 72.
- Source Type: Official (Washington State Department of Agriculture), News Article (Cheese Reporter) .
- Source Link: https://agr.wa.gov/services/food-access/programs-and-services/local-food-purchase-assistance-(lfpa), https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/17/cutting-local-food-programs-help, https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/, https://cheesereporter.com/news/2025/03/21/usda-terminating-local-food-purchase-assistance-deals-congressional-democrats-air-concerns/, https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2021/12/06/usda-establishes-food-purchase-program-transform-food-system-build-back-better-local-food-purchase
- Washington State has successfully distributed over $11 million in funding through the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, which has supported 31 hunger relief organizations and tribes in purchasing locally and regionally grown foods from 255 unique farms 72. While the program is currently in its third year (July 2024 – June 2025), the future of funding beyond this period is uncertain due to the USDA’s announcement of terminating LFPA 2025 cooperative agreements 72. This decision will likely impact the established relationships between hunger relief organizations and local farmers, potentially disrupting the progress made in strengthening local food systems and ensuring access to fresh, nutritious food for underserved communities across Washington State 72.
- West Virginia:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $2,727,150 for the school food budget and $1,060,910 for the child care budget (LFS) . Approximately $2 million cut from the state’s agriculture economy (LFPA Phase 2 cancellation) 74.
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Locally produced food for schools .
- Impacted Organizations: West Virginia farmers, Wood County Schools, Parkersburg South High School, West Virginia Department of Agriculture, food banks .
- Source Type: Media (Marietta Times, News and Sentinel), Nonprofit (Coastal Conservation League) .
- Source Link: https://www.mariettatimes.com/news/local-news/2025/03/canceled-program-provided-money-to-west-virginia-to-buy-locally-produced-food-for-schools/, https://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/business/2025/03/usda-program-cuts-affect-w-va-farmers/
- West Virginia is facing a loss of over $3.7 million in funding for the Local Food for Schools (LFS) program, with $2,727,150 allocated for the school food budget and $1,060,910 for the child care budget . Additionally, the cancellation of Phase 2 of the LFPA program will result in an estimated $2 million cut to the state’s agriculture economy 74. These cuts will impact the ability of schools to purchase locally produced food from West Virginia farmers, potentially affecting the nutritional quality of meals for students . Agriculture Commissioner Kent Leonhardt has expressed disappointment over the cancellation, noting that food banks and schools in the state depend on the income generated by purchasing local products through these programs . The elimination of this funding is expected to have a significant effect on some farmers who have built their businesses around supplying to these markets .
- Wisconsin:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: Unknown
- Notes: Farmer Rachel Bouressa’s USDA contracts (EQIP and CSP) are disrupted by the freeze 6. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (WDATCP) received a termination notice for the LFPA 2025 agreement 57. No specific financial impact of LFPA/LFS freeze found for Wisconsin as a whole .
- In Wisconsin, the USDA funding freeze is causing disruptions for farmers like Rachel Bouressa, whose Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) agreements have been affected 6. Additionally, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (WDATCP) has received a termination notice from the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) regarding the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) 2025 cooperative agreement 57. While the specific financial impact of this termination and the broader funding freeze on Wisconsin’s food banks, schools, and agricultural sector has not been detailed in the provided materials, the termination notice indicates that the agreement will end within 60 days of the March 7, 2025 letter, suggesting a forthcoming impact on the state’s local food purchasing initiatives 46.
- Wyoming:
- Estimated Value of Lost Food Aid: $535,000 grant to the Food Bank of Wyoming (LFPA) for the next fiscal year eliminated . Over $551,000 was received by the Food Bank of Wyoming from LFPA in 2023 .
- Quantity/Type of Food Affected: Approximately 200,000 pounds of food (beef, beans, grains, oats, produce) purchased from Wyoming ranchers and growers since 2023 through LFPA .
- Impacted Organizations: Food Bank of Wyoming, Wyoming family farmers and ranchers .
- Source Type: Media (Oil City News, Wyoming Public Media) .
- Source Link: https://oilcity.news/community/2025/03/18/doge-cuts-to-usda-eliminates-535k-grant-to-food-bank-of-wyoming/, https://www.wyomingpublicmedia.org/natural-resources-energy/2025-03-24/usda-ends-grant-program-that-helped-the-food-bank-of-wyoming-partner-with-local-producers
- Notes: Food insecurity need in Wyoming is at its highest level in 10 years .
- The
Works cited
- Senators Press USDA on Cuts to Food Banks, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/blogs/ag-policy-blog/blog-post/2025/03/25/senators-press-usda-cuts-food-banks
- USDA cuts $8 million in funding for Nevada school and food bank programs – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9LD3oeP6o
- Is Trump’s $1 billion food aid cut pushing more low-income Americans into hunger? Here’s how food banks, farmers, and families are struggling – The Economic Times, accessed March 25, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/is-trumps-1-billion-food-aid-cut-pushing-more-low-income-americans-into-hunger-heres-how-food-banks-farmers-and-families-are-struggling/articleshow/119484257.cms
- USDA cancels $1 billion in funding for schools and food banks to buy food from local suppliers | FOX 10 Phoenix, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/usda-cancels-local-food-purchasing
- Georgia schools and food banks lose USDA fresh food funding amid Trump cuts – WABE, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.wabe.org/trump-administration-cuts-usda-fresh-food-funding-to-schools-and-food-banks-georgia-responds/
- Farmers Speak Out on the Devastating Impact of USDA Funding Freeze, accessed March 25, 2025, https://sustainableagriculture.net/blog/farmers-speak-out-on-the-devastating-impact-of-usda-funding-freeze/
- USDA Funding Freeze Puts Family Farmers and Food Hubs at Risk, accessed March 25, 2025, https://coastalconservationleague.org/news/press-releases/usda-funding-freeze-puts-family-farmers-and-food-hubs-at-risk/
- Trump administration cancels $8M for Nevada schools, food banks …, accessed March 25, 2025, https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/trump-administration-cancels-8m-for-nevada-schools-food-banks-to-buy-from-local-farms
- USDA Announces Availability of $1.13 Billion for Local Food Programs, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2024/12/10/usda-announces-availability-113-billion-local-food-programs
- Editorial: Food Banks Need Urgent Action as USDA Food Aid Stall – Food Bank of Delaware, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.fbd.org/editorial-food-banks-need-urgent-action-as-usda-food-aid-stall/
- Federal funding cut to decrease fresh produce in food banks – NBC Connecticut, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/federal-funding-cut-to-decrease-fresh-produce-in-food-banks/3517982/
- How Does Cutting Local Food Programs Help Make America Healthy Again?, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/17/cutting-local-food-programs-help
- Farmers in Alabama and across the U.S. hurt by USDA funding freeze, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.alreporter.com/2025/02/24/farmers-in-alabama-and-across-the-u-s-hurt-by-usda-funding-freeze/
- NH Food Bank losing USDA funding as pandemic-era food programs supporting local farmers cut – Nashua Ink Link, accessed March 25, 2025, https://nashua.inklink.news/nh-food-bank-losing-usda-funding-as-pandemic-era-food-programs-supporting-local-farmers-cut/
- USDA Cancels $1 Billion in Funding That Lets Schools, Food Banks Buy Local Food – Barn Raiser, accessed March 25, 2025, https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/
- USDA Contract Freezes Continue to Threaten Local Food Programs and Conservation Efforts – DTN Progressive Farmer, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2025/03/10/usda-contract-freezes-continue-local
- State of Alaska The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), accessed March 25, 2025, https://education.alaska.gov/cnp/tefap/AK%20TEFAP%20State%20Plan%20APPROVED%201.30.2025.pdf
- How federal grant freeze impacted food shelves, food programs in Minnesota – CBS News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/how-federal-grant-freeze-impact-minnesota/
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) | Arizona Department of Economic Security, accessed March 25, 2025, https://des.az.gov/emergency-food
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) – SD Department of Education – South Dakota, accessed March 25, 2025, https://doe.sd.gov/cans/tefap.aspx
- Governor Polis: USDA Cuts Hurt Colorado Kids & Farmers, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.colorado.gov/governor/news/governor-polis-usda-cuts-hurt-colorado-kids-farmers
- USDA program cuts will impact some Colorado food banks and schools – 9News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.9news.com/article/money/usda-program-cuts-impact-colorado-food-banks-schools/73-ff3fccf3-62da-45c0-8236-937bfeccca1a
- Federal funding cuts threaten North Carolina food banks’ ability to serve communities, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.wfmynews2.com/article/news/investigations/food-federal-funding-cuts-threaten-north-carolina-food-banks-ability-to-serve-communities/83-929536f3-83fd-4664-86d1-487bc3f687ca
- USDA program cuts will impact some Colorado food banks and schools – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBEkwU69ICw
- CT loses millions intended for local food purchasing, as federal funding cuts continue | Connecticut Public, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.ctpublic.org/news/2025-03-14/ct-loses-millions-intended-for-local-food-purchasing-as-federal-funding-cuts-continue
- Texas farmers hit hard by freeze in federal funding | NBCDFW – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCB1W28ZhUU
- USDA Cancels $1 Billion in Local Food Funding for Schools and Food Banks, accessed March 25, 2025, https://gettysburgconnection.org/usda-cancels-1-billion-in-local-food-funding-for-schools-and-food-banks/
- USDA cuts $1B in local food purchasing funds. How Florida will be affected – Yahoo News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://news.yahoo.com/usda-cuts-1b-local-food-193657103.html
- Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program | Agricultural Marketing Service – USDA, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food-to-usda/lfpacap
- How Ohio’s food banks are dealing with extensive cuts from the USDA – KZYX, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.kzyx.org/national-news/2025-03-22/how-ohios-food-banks-are-dealing-with-extensive-cuts-from-the-usda
- Federal cuts threaten food and nutrition programs in Georgia – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Oosp61-Ds
- Trump administration USDA cuts will strip food away from Maine families, accessed March 25, 2025, https://mainebeacon.com/trump-administration-usda-cuts-willstrip-food-away-from-maine-families/
- USDA ends programs that help schools and food banks buy locally-grown food | KCUR – Kansas City news and NPR, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.kcur.org/news/2025-03-13/usda-ends-programs-schools-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food
- Chicago area food bank, programs say USDA funding freeze could have major effect, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/chicago-area-food-bank-programs-usda-funding/
- Amid widespread federal cuts, USDA eliminates $535K grant to Food Bank of Wyoming, accessed March 25, 2025, https://oilcity.news/community/2025/03/18/doge-cuts-to-usda-eliminates-535k-grant-to-food-bank-of-wyoming/
- USDA has halted $$$ millions of deliveries to food banks – how will this affect Oregon?, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/oregon/comments/1jgq4p1/usda_has_halted_millions_of_deliveries_to_food/
- News – Iowa Hunger Coalition, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.iowahungercoalition.org/news/
- USDA Cancels Local Food Funding, Creating Uncertainty for Iowa Farmers and Food Hubs, accessed March 25, 2025, https://iowafarmersunion.org/usda-cancels-local-food-funding-creating-uncertainty-for-iowa-farmers-and-food-hubs/
- USDA ends programs that help schools and food banks buy locally-grown food, accessed March 25, 2025, https://ipmnewsroom.org/usda-ends-programs-that-help-schools-and-food-banks-buy-locally-grown-food/
- Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) – Economic & Employment Services – Kansas Department for Children and Families, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.dcf.ks.gov/services/ees/pages/usda-commodity-programs/emergency-food-assistance-program-(tefap).aspx
- Massachusetts Farmers Face Uncertainty: Federal Funding Freeze and USDA Program Cuts Impact Local Agriculture – – Farmonaut, accessed March 25, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/usa/massachusetts-farmers-face-uncertainty-federal-funding-freeze-and-usda-program-cuts-impact-local-agriculture/
- Cuts in Federal Programs Impact Local Hunger Initiatives – Piscataquis Regional Food Center, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.prfoodcenter.org/post/cuts-in-federal-programs-impact-local-hunger-initiatives
- Small farmers left in a field of economic uncertainty amid USDA funding freezes – NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/small-farmers-economic-uncertainty-usda-funding-freezes/3799688/
- Good Shepherd Food Bank Responds to Federal Food Assistance Reductions, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.gsfb.org/blog/2025/03/12/good-shepherd-food-bank-responds-to-federal-food-assistance-reductions/
- USDA Contract Freezes Continue to Threaten Local Food Programs and Conservation Efforts – DTN Progressive Farmer, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/AG/news/article/2025/03/10/usda-contract-freezes-continue-local
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) – Maryland Department of Human Services, accessed March 25, 2025, https://dhs.maryland.gov/bureau-special-grants/tefap/
- Local Food Purchase Assistance Program (LFPA) – Montana Department of Agriculture, accessed March 25, 2025, https://agr.mt.gov/LFPA
- Oklahoma food banks brace for impact of USDA funding cuts – News on 6, accessed March 25, 2025, http://www.newson6.com/story/67ddf82f13d6d749f699e1a6/oklahoma-food-banks-brace-for-impact-of-usda-funding-cuts
- Michigan food banks hit by Trump funding freeze to local farmers, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/michigan-food-banks-hit-trump-funding-freeze-local-farmers
- How LFPA Funding Cuts Impact Local Food Banks – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w1_KNtrFL4
- USDA Federal Funding Cuts Terminate Successful Program Connecting Local NM Food Producers And Food Banks – Los Alamos Reporter, accessed March 25, 2025, https://losalamosreporter.com/2025/03/21/usda-federal-funding-cuts-terminate-successful-program-connecting-local-nm-food-producers-and-food-banks/
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) – Mississippi Department of Human Services, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.mdhs.ms.gov/help/emergency-food-assistance/
- USDA Cuts $1 Billion in Funding for Local Food Programs, Leaving Schools and Food Banks Struggling – Grants Pass Tribune, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.grantspasstribune.com/usda-cuts-1-billion-in-funding-for-local-food-programs-leaving-schools-and-food-banks-struggling/
- USDA upheaval brings uncertainty to farmers, rural communities | The Mighty 790 KFGO, accessed March 25, 2025, https://kfgo.com/2025/03/25/usda-upheaval-brings-uncertainty-to-farmers-rural-communities/
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) – The Idaho Foodbank, accessed March 25, 2025, https://idahofoodbank.org/our-impact/families-and-individuals/the-emergency-food-assistance-program-tefap/
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program – NH.gov, accessed March 25, 2025, https://apps.das.nh.gov/NHProcurement/File/attachment-2-rfp-2824-24-1.pdf
- USDA Terminating Local Food Purchase Assistance Deals; Congressional Democrats Air Concerns – Cheese Reporter, accessed March 25, 2025, https://cheesereporter.com/news/2025/03/21/usda-terminating-local-food-purchase-assistance-deals-congressional-democrats-air-concerns/
- Ending of two food programs will hit NJ residents, farmers – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-udNH9cW-E
- Ending of two food programs will hit NJ residents, farmers | NJ Spotlight News | THIRTEEN, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.thirteen.org/programs/nj-spotlight-news/usda-cuts-1741982962/
- BREAKING: USDA Announces $1 Billion in New Investments in Hunger Relief and Support for Local Food Systems – Feeding Texas, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.feedingtexas.org/news/breaking-usda-announces-1-billion-in-new-investments-in-hunger-relief-and-support-for-local-food-systems/
- Federal funding freeze puts New Mexico farmers and ranchers at risk, accessed March 25, 2025, https://rmfu.org/federal-funding-freeze-puts-new-mexico-farmers-and-ranchers-at-risk/
- USDA ends grant program that helped the Food Bank of Wyoming partner with local producers, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.wyomingpublicmedia.org/natural-resources-energy/2025-03-24/usda-ends-grant-program-that-helped-the-food-bank-of-wyoming-partner-with-local-producers
- Oregon Farmers Among Those Hit by Fed Funding Freeze of Billions of Dollars, accessed March 25, 2025, https://theashlandchronicle.com/oregon-farmers-among-those-hit-by-fed-funding-freeze-of-billions-of-dollars/
- USDA program cut impacts local food banks, local farmers – Dayton Daily News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/usda-program-cut-impacts-local-food-banks-local-farmers/VMZWRGNB5ZBG7JI4DWVJVKHLJA/
- Food distribution | Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.ldaf.la.gov/food/distribution-assistance
- USDA halts $1B funding, affecting Mississippi food banks and schools – YouTube, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a29KqrjOO-g
- Gov Shapiro Stands Up PA Farmers Appeals USDA’s Unlawful …, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.pa.gov/governor/newsroom/2025-press-releases/gov-shapiro-stands-up-pa-farmers-appeals-usda-s-unlawful-decisio.html
- Source: USDA cuts to affect local food banks, nonprofits, small farmers – Michigan Farm News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.michiganfarmnews.com/source-usda-cuts-to-affect-local-food-banks-nonprofits-small-farmers
- USDA Food Distribution in Schools – Vermont Agency of Education, accessed March 25, 2025, https://education.vermont.gov/student-support/nutrition/usda-food-distribution-schools
- Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia hit by USDA funding cuts – The Suffolk News-Herald, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.suffolknewsherald.com/2025/03/18/foodbank-of-southeastern-virginia-hit-by-usda-funding-cuts/
- USDA ends $1B in local food programs for schools, food banks – Organ Mountain News, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.organmountainnews.com/usda-ends-1b-in-local-food-programs-for-schools-food-banks/
- Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) – Washington State Department of Agriculture, accessed March 25, 2025, https://agr.wa.gov/services/food-access/programs-and-services/local-food-purchase-assistance-(lfpa)
- Food Banks Carry On Amid Threats to Funding, accessed March 25, 2025, https://foodbanknews.org/food-banks-carry-on-amid-threats-to-funding/
- USDA program cuts affect West Virginia farmers – News and Sentinel, accessed March 25, 2025, https://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/business/2025/03/usda-program-cuts-affect-w-va-farmers/