Thursday, August 13, 2026Latest
Tariff refunds top $100 billion since Supreme Court struck down leviesWholesale prices flat in July, adding to signs inflation is coolingLansing senior fair draws about 500 attendeesJames picks state lawmaker DeBoyer as running mate for governorFed holds rates steady again as inflation and job losses collideMichigan AG warns of bank impersonation phone scams

American2Day

News and opinion for Michigan, Eaton County, and the Mulliken area

American2Day

News and opinion for Michigan, Eaton County, and the Mulliken area

National

Research finds political groups often mask their agenda in their names

A2D News Desk

Political action committees are responsible for nearly two-thirds of federal election funding, having raised about $6.3 billion and spent $4.8 billion since January 2025, according to research published by The Conversation. Researchers say some of that influence comes not from spending but from deliberately misleading PAC names designed to make voters think a group supports the opposite of what it actually backs.

Examples cited include Americans for Progressive Action, which gave more than $1.3 million to Republican Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez in Massachusetts in 2014 despite its name, and Patriot Majority USA, which used a gun-toting minuteman logo while running ads supporting Democratic candidates. Protect Women Ohio Action Inc. contributed to conservative ads opposing a ballot initiative limiting Ohio's authority to restrict abortion. More recently, the PACs Real Change and Lead Left ran ads in competitive congressional districts attacking Democratic candidates while appearing to be progressive groups; researchers traced email subscriptions from Real Change to Cavalry LLC, a Republican communications firm founded by a former chief of staff to Sen. Mitch McConnell that has received more than $10 million from the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC aligned with House Republican leadership.

In a controlled experiment involving more than 650 participants recruited through the platform Prolific, researchers found that misleading PAC names significantly shifted people's support for identical proposed laws depending on whether the sponsoring PAC's name matched or contradicted the law's ideological direction. The effect was strongest among people who identified most strongly with a political party.

Federal regulations require PACs to disclose their names "in a clear and conspicuous manner" in political advertisements, but that disclosure requirement does not address whether the names themselves are misleading.

Read the full story at theconversation.com.

Leave a Reply